![]() |
L.A. is Plasti-Dipping their streets.
They claim they are making their roads white--it goes on white, but dries grey, and they say it leaves the surface 10° cooler. It costs $40,000 per mile and lasts seven years. One complaint? Yes, it reflects the rising and setting sun. https://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/cl...ainted-streets
|
Or, you could simply pave in concrete, which is a legitimate option in sunny California. :p
|
Sounds horrible to drive on due to the increased light, but hey, the road is 10 degrees cooler, so who cares that it costs a fortune and will cause more accidents.
I read somewhere that concrete roads are more cost effective in the long run than asphalt, but nobody wants to front the initial cost. It also reduces rolling resistance if I remember correctly. |
:rolleyes:
|
Asphalt roads are 7dB quieter than concrete, so there is that. Turning the volume down | Asphalt magazine
Ten or fifteen years ago a radio host commented he was looking forward to driving on the newly-rubberized section of the 101, which made his car feel like a Mercedes. |
I thought sunny CA would have roads made of solar cells by now. :confused:
|
Quote:
If the roads are rubberized and squishy, do we still need tires? :confused: |
Quote:
What's the idea of rubberized roads. A place to get rid of worn out tires? |
Twenty years ago I passed a crew resurfacing a road. A truck's tires were covered with asphalt.
How long do those tires last? Do they need to replace them when they have too much asphalt? |
Quote:
Big difference. There's a reason that NEDC "cheating" test facilities use trick asphalt... you get a mathematical bonus for using asphalt in the tests, because it is higher friction than concrete. Then you slick it down for lower friction and take advantage of the unfair multipliers. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com