Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2011, 05:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: santa fe, nm
Posts: 20

zappy - '97 suzuki swift
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
legal to use rear camera(s) and remove mirrors?

now that rear-camera are available and not very expensive, I am wondering if it is legal to remove side mirrors completely and use only the cameras?

In NM there is no inspection and I am sure you could weasel out of potential tickets by telling an officer the mirror fell off.... but I am wondering if it is legal, varies by state, or what ?!

__________________
Dan
http://www.envirokarma.org
- home eSwift, eMiata, and MMach-e -
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-07-2011, 06:03 PM   #2 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I would think mounting the camera where the mirror belongs would satisfy both legal requirements and the desire to reduce the Cd.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ShadeTreeMech For This Useful Post:
dtbaker61 (04-07-2011)
Old 04-07-2011, 06:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: santa fe, nm
Posts: 20

zappy - '97 suzuki swift
Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
hhmm, that would be an interesting argument... to convince a cop that the little quarter-inch camera lens fulfills all the duties of a rea-view mirror, thus should be considered legal. I think that sounds plausible!
__________________
Dan
http://www.envirokarma.org
- home eSwift, eMiata, and MMach-e -
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dtbaker61 For This Useful Post:
binky (04-09-2011)
Old 04-07-2011, 06:35 PM   #4 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
cop:where's your mirror?
you:right there. (pointing at the camera)
cop:it's not a mirror
you:no, it sends a 3.5 megapixel image to this videoscreen here

(a thought:what power consumption would there be for such an apparatus? Would it be less than the cost of the air drag from regular mirrors? How much more enviromentally friendly is the manufacture of a mirror compared to a mini LCD display and camera?)
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2011, 09:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
I have found that it is frowned upon in the MA safety inspections, but in the 2 1/2+ years I have driven with video mirrors, I have never been stopped or questioned by a police officer.

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post105631
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2011, 02:22 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Neil! Please pm me the link to your mirror(ectomy) thread...

In Pa, the law states mirrors, including a min size and type, and that there must be two, one of which must be on the drivers side.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 09:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The link in my post above takes you to the beginning of the video mirrors posts; in my xA thread.

Video Mirrors on Scion xA
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2011, 01:43 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 204

- - '10 Toyota Prius III w/Navi
Thanks: 4
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Hi All,

Most states allow you to remove the passenger side mirror, if you can see out the back of the vehicle. So, you could put a camera there without too much hassle, as long as your boatail does not block your rear view.

In suburban Chicagoland, the Cops seem to be more interested in making court appearances, than staying on the road, SO, I would not remove the driver's side mirror around here....

Last edited by donee; 04-10-2011 at 02:33 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2011, 02:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I just got through reading pa code. It specifically says: "(b) Rearview mirrors. A vehicle specified under this subchapter shall be equipped with at least one rearview mirror or similar device which provides the driver an unobstructed view of the highway to the rear of the vehicle for a distance of not less than 200 feet. A mirror may no be cracked, broken or discolored."

Which says that you only ACTUALLY NEED one mirror, or SIMILAR DEVICE. I.e. a camera.

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com