Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-10-2010, 06:00 PM   #61 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lacey, Wa
Posts: 27

Tiny - '90 Honda CRX HF
Last 3: 55.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You could probably work wonders with a fiberglass front bumper too. I personally would like to get a cheapo fiberglass front bumper and turn it into a bubble so I can help the wind bend around my front end instead of hitting it and being forced around and maybe mold the top of it so that it creates a smooth angle to the hood, and a lip that goes around the headlight so the top of the bumper has a lip that plexi can be attached to to make one incredibly aero bumper.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-10-2010, 06:10 PM   #62 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lacey, Wa
Posts: 27

Tiny - '90 Honda CRX HF
Last 3: 55.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
has anybody considered replacing their hood and fenders with fiberglass? They're a lot lighter to begin with and from what I understand it's easy to sand them and add more fiberglass to create what you want from it so it looks more "whole" and not pieced together. Plus it erases all the little edges that catch the wind when you slap on pvc. Or does it not flow with this site's mantra since you have to put up more money than to just slap on the pvc?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2010, 11:35 AM   #63 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Wells, Maine
Posts: 50
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
On my '95 Saturn TDI project, I pushed the headlights forward about an inch to bring them flush with the leading edge of the hood, rather than being recessed under it. I also took some Lexan and installed it around the lower front fascia to fill in the grille area (which is huge) and the little air scoops on either side. I already have a chin spoiler under the car to duct air up into the intercooler and radiator, so cooling shouldn't pose a problem.

I just did this last night, so I haven't tested the results yet, but I'm looking foward to seeing what kind of results I get from this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2011, 05:13 PM   #64 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Middletown, De
Posts: 10

Moonlight GT - '96 Ford Mustang GT
90 day: 24.46 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I would really like to test out a full body belly pan on my 96 mustang...It has no belly pan at all under there so I figure it may be worth an mpg or two
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2011, 10:09 PM   #65 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Nden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Diego,CA
Posts: 151
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via MSN to Nden Send a message via Yahoo to Nden
Not sure if it did much yet for mpg, but I installed some CF F1 style side mirrors on my '92 Vx. At 1rst it didn't look like it would mount up properly, but my buddy sanded down the 3 mounting surfaces with a belt sander & a lil drilling to make the inside bolts work. Less drag but looks better than the oem side-mirrors which were all scratched up on the glass & vibrating too much(hella annoying). I'll post up pics tomorrow. Cost was a lil high $200? and took a month for manufacturer to make & ship
__________________
If you don't know your rights, its like you don't have any at all. Pre Paid Legal & ID Theft Services Restoration available... check out

http://www.deantaber.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2011, 08:38 AM   #66 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Hope you can detect an fe change. Makes me feel a little better about blowing so much money at the casino.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2011, 01:34 AM   #67 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Omaha
Posts: 52

BigWhiteWhale - '01 Ford F250 Lariat Crew Cab Superduty
Thanks: 12
Thanked 17 Times in 9 Posts
“Mostly Stock” Ford F-250 Runs 182 MPH at Bonneville .: Articles

Check these F250 Mods.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2011, 12:19 AM   #68 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
The cab-to-bed gap on some pickups get overly large.
Has anyone tested this? Any gains in sealing this up?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 06:58 PM   #69 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
mantra

Quote:
Originally Posted by crx driver View Post
has anybody considered replacing their hood and fenders with fiberglass? They're a lot lighter to begin with and from what I understand it's easy to sand them and add more fiberglass to create what you want from it so it looks more "whole" and not pieced together. Plus it erases all the little edges that catch the wind when you slap on pvc. Or does it not flow with this site's mantra since you have to put up more money than to just slap on the pvc?
A 10% weight reduction yields slightly better than 2% mpg increase at 70-mph.
Most automakers have plucked the weight reduction low-hanging fruit.
To properly do fiberglass,you're looking at a full-scale 'male' plug,from which the 'female' mold can be made,in which the actual part is layed-up.
It's a great deal of work and expensive if your time is worth anything to you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2011, 07:22 PM   #70 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...assuming a "midsize sedan" weight class of roughly 3,000 lbs, GM put forth this 'inverse" relationship back in 1999:

(W1 / W2)^(0.72) = (mpg2 / mpg1)

...where:

W1 = existing curb weight
W2 = new vehicle curb weight
mpg1 = existing fuel economy
mpg2 = new vehicle fuel economy

...wonder *how* that 0.72 power coefficient varies as weight increases or decreases?


Last edited by gone-ot; 10-17-2011 at 08:54 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com