Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > The Unicorn Corral
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-18-2022, 02:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Michigan
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Tuner chips?

I am curious if anyone here has ever tested tuner chips that have claims of improved fuel economy. I have seen mainstream ones and this one that seems a bit more sketchy.
https://shop.proecofuel.com/page/che...c3=signaltrndy

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-18-2022, 03:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,879
Thanks: 23,955
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
Chips

1) The concept is valid. In the early 1990s, GM brought an Oldsmobile to Bonneville, where they made run after run with different chips. The attache they were carried in was referred to as the 'million-dollar briefcase.'
2) Variable-Valve-Timing might still be a function of oil pressure, but ignition timing, fuel injector nozzle dwell , and turbo waste-gate would remain candidates for electronic controlled.
3) For EPA compliance and vehicle certification, one might presume that the automaker had already optimized the ECU and sensors.
4) Personally, I'd avoid them like how people used to avoid plagues.
5) For meaningful fuel savings, one has to attack rolling resistance and aerodynamic drag.
6) You can purchase a bona-fide 350%-to-400% mpg improvement today simply by moving to an electric vehicle.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Ecky (02-19-2022)
Old 02-18-2022, 04:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,498

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,066 Times in 1,396 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cryptinox View Post
I am curious if anyone here has ever tested tuner chips that have claims of improved fuel economy. I have seen mainstream ones and this one that seems a bit more sketchy.
https://shop.proecofuel.com/page/che...c3=signaltrndy
You can tune a car to increase fuel economy. However, in general, the ones that actual work are illegal and increase emission levels to achieve those fuel savings. If the manufacturer doesn't say it is EPA certified or has a CARB executive order number the tune is illegal to use on-highway.

However, those tunes are specific to your car. Anything that says it can be plugged into the OBDII port of any car and reduce fuel consumption by 15 - 30% is snakeoil.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-18-2022)
Old 02-18-2022, 05:26 PM   #4 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,111 Times in 980 Posts
You upload/download software through the obd2 port unless you disassemble the case. Ask any dealer except tesla. Can be ota, except anything before 2015 is turned off by the phone carriers

Hmmm not sure about 911 calls auto initiated by the airbag.

Otherwise more than 5% improvement without more emissions or less HP is oil extract of snake.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piotrsko For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-18-2022)
Old 02-18-2022, 06:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,645
Thanks: 7,764
Thanked 8,575 Times in 7,061 Posts

knowyourmeme.com/photos/1157682-gadsden-flag-dont-tread-on-me
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-18-2022), Piotrsko (02-19-2022)
Old 02-19-2022, 01:36 AM   #6 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,181

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,524 Times in 2,798 Posts
Gasoline engines can be leaned to get up a 20% boost in fuel economy. It makes more NOx. Not really a pollutant unless you live in California. Since they have the top 7 worst polluted cities in the US, I wouldn't encourage making it worse.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com