07-17-2019, 12:33 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,233
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,232 Times in 1,722 Posts
|
Lotus's Evija, a 1,680-kg, $2.1m electric car that charges in nine minutes
The charger is vaporware, but using existing technology it would charge in 18 minutes with a 270-mile range.
However, it is slower than a Tesla, which is fun, considering it is ridiculously more expensive.
https://www.engadget.com/2019/07/16/...car-ev-launch/
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2019, 06:51 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: KY
Posts: 1,352
Thanks: 63
Thanked 366 Times in 269 Posts
|
Reading closely in the article, Lotus reckons they can have the car at 1680kg, not 1680lb... which is still incredibly light for something they’re promising some almost 2000hp from...
__________________
My current Ecotec project...
My last Ecotec project...
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 19bonestock88 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-17-2019, 10:12 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,233
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,232 Times in 1,722 Posts
|
"[T]he Evija is shooting for a target weight of 1,680kg."
Mods! I made a boo-boo! Please fix my title!
Who in the world measures in kilograms?! The Drug Enforcement Administration?!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-17-2019, 02:58 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,773
Thanks: 4,321
Thanked 4,474 Times in 3,439 Posts
|
Would like to see Elise/Exige electrified.
EVs should probably be AWD considering the extreme torque they can instantly lay down. If for no other reason than to help preserve the life of tires.
|
|
|
|
|
07-17-2019, 03:22 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,233
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,232 Times in 1,722 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
EVs should probably be AWD considering the extreme torque they can instantly lay down. If for no other reason than to help preserve the life of tires.
|
How difficult would that be with two motors?
Burning out tires only benefits tire companies. |
|
|
|
|
07-18-2019, 01:41 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
I wouldn't count on the Lotus being "slower" It probably will be able to complete a full lap at Nürburgring without gong into limp mode. Even if the Roadster ever gets built and has the brakes and battery cooling upgraded, it will never get over it's weight penalty if braking and cornering, along with acceleration is involved.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
07-18-2019, 11:40 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,389
Thanks: 532
Thanked 1,196 Times in 1,055 Posts
|
Remember that Elons first Tesla was a gutted lotus "roller" with batteries in the trunk
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
|
|
07-18-2019, 01:11 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,773
Thanks: 4,321
Thanked 4,474 Times in 3,439 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
How difficult would that be with two motors?
|
Difficult?
Tesla has that as an option in their vehicles. They use a more expensive permanent magnet motor for one axle, and a less expensive inductive motor for the other. It runs only the 1 efficient motor when the power and traction isn't needed, and both when it is.
It's as difficult as putting another motor, controller, and axles/differential on the car. No idea what that would add to the cost to manufacture. $800? |
|
|
|
|
07-18-2019, 01:27 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,233
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,232 Times in 1,722 Posts
|
So, an extra $6,000 is excessive? |
|
|
|
|
07-18-2019, 02:32 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,773
Thanks: 4,321
Thanked 4,474 Times in 3,439 Posts
|
Adding dual motors is a way to boost profit, as shown by Tesla. Many consumers value the added range, power, and traction that the dual motor version of the S provided more than the price premium Tesla put on that option.
Looks like the Model 3 has dual motor variants now too. One is marketed as AWD, and the other is "performance".
There's a table 1/3rd down this page that shows the different specs. Apparently there's no range to be added by dual motors in the 3 since the single motor version already utilizes the efficient permanent magnet motor. It's a speed and traction boost only.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Model_3
|
|
|
|
|
