Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2012, 05:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 31

Casey - '11 Mazda 2 Touring
90 day: 46.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mazdaspeed rear spoiler

The other day, while at my friendly neighborhood Mazda dealer I got a look at the backend of a 2012 Mazdaspeed 3. It was beautiful!


What I couldn't help thinking was that it looked something like the spoiler talked about in this article that supposedly decreases drag by 6%: Green Car Congress: Novel Spoiler Design Reduces Fuel Consumption for Minivans, SUVs

Does anybody have any insight into whether this is the case? Is this the same or a similar spoiler? What effect does it have in real life?

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-23-2012, 12:12 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
We'd need to see the profile to be able to gauge the angle of departure -- to form a proper Kamm back the angle has to be down and at the correct angle. Many of these kick up, and so they usually add drag.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012, 03:26 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
CigaR007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 720

GreenTurtle (Retired) - '01 Toyota Echo Sedan
90 day: 44.85 mpg (US)

Zulu - '14 Honda CR-Z
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 155
Thanked 274 Times in 168 Posts
Here's a sideview.



Given the car's high performance, I would say that the rear spoiler is mainly for downforce at higher speeds and styling for everything else. It would not surprise me if there would be an aero penalty; drag-wise. I say that because the gap between the spoiler and the roofline is imposing (for downforce generation ?) and it does not follow a downwards trajectory; quite the opposite actually.

I could be wrong though. I will let the aero experts chime in on the matter.

Last edited by CigaR007; 01-23-2012 at 03:39 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012, 11:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Yes, I'm sure there is some added drag as a result... it's almost unavoidable. The report I read that described the development of my car's airfoil was very clear that the developers had lowered the drag to downforce/antilift ratios. However, the report was also clear that, regardless, there was still a significant increase in drag.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com