10-06-2012, 08:13 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
MBenz B-Class .26 Cd" sleeker than bullet" with video
MBenz B-Class is "sleeker than a bullet" at .26, but is it just me or are the engineers just soaking up overtime ? I mean c'mon over 275,000 hours of computer modeling and 1100 hours of wind tunnel testing for a .26 Cd ???
It's no wonder people have the impression that the way that a car comes from the factory is the best it can get, and that to improve the aerodynamics on a car one must have a PHD and spend thousands of hours at it.
" Mercedes says that over 275,000 hours of computer modeling and 1100 hours of wind tunnel testing were involved in making the B-Class so aerodynamic. Among the tricks used include a sealed front fascia (including special seals that prevent air leaking past the headlights), a large roof spoiler, special slots and spoilers around the wheel arches, a flat underbody panel, and adjustable radiator shutters that can open or close depending on how much cooling air the engine requires.
Read more: Video Find: Mercedes-Benz B-Class Sleeker Than a Bullet? - WOT on Motor Trend "
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 08:20 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
" First car in the world with a 'Pagoda' roof "
Really ???
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 09:51 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,939
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,804 Times in 941 Posts
|
Hmmm... the guy in the Mercedes jacket also claims the B-class is "the most aerodynamically efficient car in the world" around 2:30. It looks like the frontal area might be slightly larger than a Prius III, which at Cd .25 would have lower total drag.
Edit: I'm right--the 2013 B-class is 70.3" wide and 61.3" high vs. the Prius' 68.7" width and 58.7" height.
Last edited by Vman455; 10-06-2012 at 09:59 AM..
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 10:12 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Southern France
Posts: 159
AX - '95 Citröen AX 307 - '04 Peugeot 307 SW
Thanks: 12
Thanked 67 Times in 37 Posts
|
The Citroën AX is even better and was produced in... 1986.
Cd : 0,31
Frontal area : 1,74 m² (18,85 sq ft)
CdA : 5,84 vs 6 for the Prius.
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 10:18 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,939
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,804 Times in 941 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HypermilerAX
The Citroën AX is even better and was produced in... 1986.
Cd : 0,31
Frontal area : 1,74 m² (18,85 sq ft)
CdA : 5,84 vs 6 for the Prius.
|
The more things change, the more they stay the same...or get worse!
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 04:01 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
|
claims
Perhaps their claim is a contextual remark based on a particular market segment of crossover SUVs based on length,height,width,and curb weight at the time of press release.
Certainly,all their effort was to chip away at a hard design and quit at some point at which time diminishing returns were devouring their budget.
If we look at their market competition it would give a contrast to their remarks.
The upshot is that Daimler-Benz thinks aerodynamics a market 'driver'.If so,that's a good thing,as the level of general consumer education may be dragged to new levels along with the hyperbole.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 04:53 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master Ecomadman
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
|
A bullet has more acceleration and higher top speed.
__________________
- Tony
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 05:17 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Smeghead
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
|
I have bullets with a Cd of around 1.5, I also have bullets with a Cd of greater than .4
__________________
Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.
One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 05:21 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
|
Exactly which bullet? Wadcutter?
|
|
|
10-06-2012, 05:52 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,256
Thanks: 24,382
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
|
bullet
I don't have the table with me,but I believe the 'Aberdeen' type,boat-tailed projectiles are Cd 0.158 at sub-sonic velocities.
Hornady makes a real screamer in small caliber.
The latest Barrett sniper round should have a low sub-sonic Cd as well.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
Last edited by aerohead; 10-06-2012 at 05:54 PM..
Reason: addition
|
|
|
|