Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-05-2021, 04:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroMcAeroFace View Post
I don't think this is any way relevant, water is about 1000 times more dense than air and so aerodynamics barely matter on a boat compared to water drag assuming a displacement hull.
100X's but your point is relevant.

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-06-2021, 06:28 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 13
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
My current thought is to just leave the frond door open when feasible.

But now, with my newfound knowledge from you guys of how inefficient boats are at getting around, I'm wanting to learn more about hydrodynamics and how I might be able to make it more efficiently move through the water.

Considering how much more dense water is, then any small improvements would be amplified/magnified. I should probably pick up a Basics of Hydrodynamics book.

On plane, widening the lifting strakes at the back of the pontoons would probably help. For slow speed running, having the pontoons end in a boattail is probably better than the way they abruptly end now. I have some research to do!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kingofwylietx For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-10-2021)
Old 03-10-2021, 12:41 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,892
Thanks: 23,969
Thanked 7,221 Times in 4,648 Posts
Hydrodynamics

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingofwylietx View Post
My current thought is to just leave the frond door open when feasible.

But now, with my newfound knowledge from you guys of how inefficient boats are at getting around, I'm wanting to learn more about hydrodynamics and how I might be able to make it more efficiently move through the water.

Considering how much more dense water is, then any small improvements would be amplified/magnified. I should probably pick up a Basics of Hydrodynamics book.

On plane, widening the lifting strakes at the back of the pontoons would probably help. For slow speed running, having the pontoons end in a boattail is probably better than the way they abruptly end now. I have some research to do!
I just went over to GOOGLE: US NAVY David Taylor Model Basin low-drag hull design.
There's a listing for :'An Assessment of Naval Hydrodynamics Science and Technology,' book.
These people do everything from nuclear submarines, to torpedoes. I can't vouch for it, but I trust the source!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2021, 02:00 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,691
Thanks: 7,774
Thanked 8,584 Times in 7,068 Posts
Just trying to be helpful:

duckduckgo.com/?q=An+Assessment+of+Naval+Hydrodynamics+Science+an d+Technology

Your choices for source include:
books.apple.com
play.google.com
w*w.nap.edu
w*w.amazon.com
(Expurgated to work around vBulletin nannying. Why it adds a space in +and+, I will never understand. Don't get me started on it's spell checker. )

My most favored hull design is the DDG/?q=M-hull. It's essentailly a trimaran, although the Bayliner variant appears to be a 'quintmaran'.

So it seems like you could add deflectors between the pontoons to nudge them in this direction. Essentially you'd promote counter-rotating vortexes between the central and outer pontoons, and then choke down the tunnel toward the rear to make that nice flat wake the M-hull produces.


https://toolmonger.com/wp-content/up...wake72-450.jpg
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-10-2021)
Old 03-11-2021, 10:06 AM   #15 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,061
Thanks: 467
Thanked 1,112 Times in 981 Posts
I always thought the process was to clean up vortices and reduce the skin friction by having less hull contact.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2021, 01:40 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,691
Thanks: 7,774
Thanked 8,584 Times in 7,068 Posts
Quoth DDG:
Quote:
Designing Ship Hull - What is M-Hull? - Bright Hub Engineering
https://www.brighthubengineering.com...ull-technolgy/
M-hull technology is an innovative development that uses a specifically M shaped hull to create an air cushion below the vessel in order to reduce the air drag. The M shaped hull captures the bow wave energy to form an air cushion, which thus reduces the drag.

M-hull: new thinking in boat design - Soundings Online
https://www.soundingsonline.com/news...in-boat-design
"The M-hull eliminates the speed limitations of displacement craft," says M Ship co-founder Chuck Robinson. "It's a major breakthrough in hull design because the more pressure is captured in the hull tunnels, the higher the boat rises out of the water, the faster it goes and the less draft it has."
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2021, 10:18 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,892
Thanks: 23,969
Thanked 7,221 Times in 4,648 Posts
hull drag

There used to be something called 'lamniflow' technology, but I can't find it online. I believe it was tested on torpedoes.
Riblet technology has been explored, derived from shark skin. Pockets of dead water are captured all over the submerged surface, and surrounding water touches mostly water on the Hull's surface.
The Russians use 'bubbler' technology, which introduces a layer of air bubbles along the hull's surface, reducing the amount of fluid actually in contact with the hull.
An extreme case is, the rocket-powered Russian torpedo, which shunts a portion of the rocket exhaust to the nose, and the torpedo travels as a full-cavitation device, never actually in contact with the water.
Other than all that, the other strategy is to raise the hull onto hydrofoils, lifting most of its surface completely clear of the water.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com