Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-30-2019, 07:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
More efficient HVAC fan for cars?

I no longer have the 93 tracer wagon... upgraded to a 99 Escort wagon with a swapped in zetec engine. I will soon have changed to all LED's for car lighting, except front turn signals so I can prevent hyperblinking. The last big power draw normally in use is the HVAC fan. I have already insulated all the panels below the window line front to rear with 1/2 duct insulation and will be doing the roof this next year, so my heating and cooling loads will probably be cut in half. Has anyone found a more efficient motor for using for the HVAC or some way to make the current motor more efficient to run? Any cheap ECM motors or more efficient speed controls so I could run the motor at low speeds efficiently?

I am also running a 25 % underdrive pulley. Gearing in the car however, keeps the revs up.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-30-2019, 09:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,032

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 14.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 315 Times in 226 Posts
I had linked to something about this before, but the images are gone... Assuming your car doesnít already have it, PWM speed control. At full speed it doesnít matter, at the lowest speed the amount of power drawn is small. IIRC I think when youíre running medium or low-medium with resistors you could be using 75-80% of the power of running full speed, and have half of it being used by the resistors. The percentage being wasted on low is greater, but the total draw is much less.
I donít think it would be worth it unless you get a junkyard PWM speed control with connector, and it used as many or more individual speed inputs as your current resistor.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2019, 09:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
I think I currently have 4 speeds. If I understand correctly , you are saying that the current low speed already is using much lower power than the higher speeds or is that only with the PWM control? I assumed that all speeds have resistors, so I also assumed power draw was always high.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2019, 10:31 PM   #4 (permalink)
EV convert
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 7,908

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 124.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 180
Thanked 2,524 Times in 1,971 Posts
Full speed just runs straight electrical system power to the blower. But a pwm can make it a lot more efficient over a resistor.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2019, 11:51 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
yep...

I meant to say resistors on all the lower speeds. I am guessing the only time I'll need high is for defrosting. I bet low will be enough for heating even on below zero days once I finish the insulation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2019, 12:09 AM   #6 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,032

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 14.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 315 Times in 226 Posts
So if say you used the lowest (speed 1) primarily, the total draw is relatively low, and while pwm would gain a lot in terms of %, the total amperage, or wattage to be saved would be very small. The real gains to be had with pwm would be if you use speeds 2 or 3 commonly. If you only used speeds 1 and 4 it really wouldn’t matter whether you had pwm or not
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2019, 08:37 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Newb
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,829

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 28.07 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,236
Thanked 2,615 Times in 1,934 Posts
That doesn't make sense. The highest efficiency gains to be had with PWM would be at the lowest settings and have diminishing returns the higher the "speed" (lower resistance) up until the "hi" setting, which is a straight connection to the battery.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Ecky (12-03-2019)
Old 12-01-2019, 09:33 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 966

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 33.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 186
Thanked 392 Times in 253 Posts
I once measured the heater blower power draw in my truck: https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...raw-18678.html.

In winter, I mostly leave the heater blower on the lowest speed, and the second lowest speed when the temperature is below zero Fahrenheit. A more efficient blower with LED lighting is tempting because it would have got me THAT close to a 40 MPG summer average....
__________________
The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (12-01-2019)
Old 12-01-2019, 01:33 PM   #9 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,032

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 14.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 315 Times in 226 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
That doesn't make sense. The highest efficiency gains to be had with PWM would be at the lowest settings and have diminishing returns the higher the "speed" (lower resistance) up until the "hi" setting, which is a straight connection to the battery.
It sounds counter intuitive on the surface, but a greater percentage of a smaller number wouldn’t necessarily be more than a smaller percentage of a greater number or vice versa. Jrmichler's blower doubled its draw from speed 1 to 2, so if the efficiency gains aren't double on low vs setting 2, you would be saving more power on setting 2 than 1.
I imagine this could also vary from vehicle to vehicle. I’m also regurgitating info i saw years ago I can’t see from some chart on Pulse-Width Modulated Fan Controllers for Automotive Applications | PowerGuru - Power Electronics Information Portal
But maybe you can with a different browser. But as I recall, it seemed like the squeeze wasn’t going to be worth the juice at the lowest setting
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2019, 03:16 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
Hmm

I was thinking that the resistors would keep the total power used pretty constant no matter what speed you're on , but that assumption is obviously not right. It looks like I will be saving quite a bit just by being able to run low almost all the time.

I understand what you are saying about the percentage savings being higher at low speed, but the power consumption is already so low it isn't really worth upgrading.

It looks like I am already at the knee in the cost effectiveness curve. I'll just replace the rest of the Instrument lights with LEDs and I'll be in good shape.


If I eventually get the AC working, that insulation should gain me some MPG in the summer too. The compressor and blower both will have a lot less work to do.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com