Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-29-2013, 09:39 PM   #21 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,233

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,232 Times in 1,722 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I wondered about part C also - and guessed it's to send air around the "bumper" / structure rather than through it.

AND... I wondered if these were replacements for the side skirt approach. Not really necessary if there are skirts, I don't think.
My first thought was to make the bumper sections airfoil-shaped.

Quote:
Originally Posted by groar View Post
About "C" I think first goal is to prevent cars to go too far under the truck in case of rear collision to save the life of the inattentive driver. This is mandatory in Europe.

Denis.
Rear-ending a collection of air-foil shaped structures, into the pointy ends, is probably a good reason to not ever do this.



Is it me, or do the "air lines" not follow the curve of the truck? It looks like it actually tapers too much.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com