09-10-2009, 04:23 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orlando
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
MPG's (difference with bio D vs. SVO vs. regular diesel?)
Will your vehicle obtain better MPG's by using Biodiesel or even straight vegetable oil, rather than running on regular diesel??
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
03-29-2012, 10:21 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Bump
|
|
|
|
|
03-29-2012, 10:42 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
|
diesel is a funny thing. when they went to super low sulphur, we all suffered loss of MPG.
look at this chart, then consider diesel now has less btu's then when it was written.
Biodiesel Fuel |
|
|
|
|
03-29-2012, 10:54 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,467
Thanks: 4,213
Thanked 4,391 Times in 3,365 Posts
|
Good link. So according to that info, 7-10% drop in mpg due to bio-fuels. What percent BTU drop is ULSD compared to LSD?
|
|
|
|
|
03-30-2012, 09:19 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
People I've talked to said that they didn't notice any drop in mileage, due partly to the added top end lubrication of bio-diesel.
But even if it's a 10% drop in mileage (haven't heard anyone have that happen) it's still a 100% reduction of petroleum diesel and oil crops produce enough oil that farmers can grow their own fuel, press it on site and come out ahead, from what I remember energy input in to making bio-diesel was less then 10% of what you get out of it, corn ethanol is no where near that efficient.
|
|
|
|
|
03-30-2012, 10:57 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
|
actually, biodiesel is MUCH more expensive then ethanol to produce. Biodiesel is from oil - takes a LOT of plant oil to make biodiesel.
ethanol is starch/sugar. lots of starch/sugar in plants. that is the reason ethanol is so much cheaper to buy then biodiesel.
|
|
|
|
|
03-30-2012, 11:32 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100
actually, biodiesel is MUCH more expensive then ethanol to produce. Biodiesel is from oil - takes a LOT of plant oil to make biodiesel.
|
If they stick to rapeseed , that is.
There are plants that yield far more oil than rapeseed or soy.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
|
|
03-30-2012, 12:41 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100
actually, biodiesel is MUCH more expensive then ethanol to produce. Biodiesel is from oil - takes a LOT of plant oil to make biodiesel.
ethanol is starch/sugar. lots of starch/sugar in plants. that is the reason ethanol is so much cheaper to buy then biodiesel.
|
Ethanol also gets huge government subsidies, around 50-70 cents per gallon? the person who told me that bio-diesel was not very energy intensive to produce was a farmer who has been growing oil crops for bio-diesel for a number of years now and they wanted to find out for sure how much energy it took them to produce their fuel so they kept records of all the fuel used to produce the fuel they used on the rest of their farm along with electricity used to run the press and all of their other inputs, I wish I could find my notes, but it was a tiny amount of energy was going in to their fuel.
Last edited by Ryland; 03-30-2012 at 01:08 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
03-30-2012, 01:54 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
|
When I would process WVO for use I put almost no energy into it, just a little time.
Even then when Diesel was around $3/gal I could produce at least $30 worth of fuel per hour spent on it, bigger batchs yelded a higher $/hour number, over $40 per hour sometimes.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
03-30-2012, 03:42 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmiller100
actually, biodiesel is MUCH more expensive then ethanol to produce. Biodiesel is from oil - takes a LOT of plant oil to make biodiesel.
ethanol is starch/sugar. lots of starch/sugar in plants. that is the reason ethanol is so much cheaper to buy then biodiesel.
|
I don't believe that. Making biodiesel is a very simple process with cheap materials. Ethanol requires large amounts of water and energy to make.
I get slightly better mileage with biodiesel; I attribute that to higher cetane as the energy level of B100 is very close to ULSD.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
|
|
