Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-14-2013, 06:05 PM   #21 (permalink)
Eco Sol
 
Shortie771's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 343
Thanks: 24
Thanked 88 Times in 52 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joggernot View Post
Here is Pop Mech test of Fastskinz on cars. Hope the link works. Well, it seems I'm not allowed to post a link to it. So do a search on Popular Mechanics Fastskinz Test Drive and you should find it.

Joggernot
Not sure if this is the one you are talking about but HERE

__________________




Best Tank = 42.72 mpg (in the 94 Del Sol)

CR-Z Current Mods:
Max Sidewall PSI
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-14-2013, 06:10 PM   #22 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,240

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,723 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joggernot View Post
Here is Pop Mech test of Fastskinz on cars. Hope the link works. Well, it seems I'm not allowed to post a link to it. So do a search on Popular Mechanics Fastskinz Test Drive and you should find it.

Joggernot
Popular Mechanics generally does a better job than "Mythbusters." Here is MetroMPG's thread, which links to the article:

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...aims-8321.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
yeah we've been through that already
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 06:14 PM   #23 (permalink)
Eco Sol
 
Shortie771's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 343
Thanks: 24
Thanked 88 Times in 52 Posts
yep, same page I linked
__________________




Best Tank = 42.72 mpg (in the 94 Del Sol)

CR-Z Current Mods:
Max Sidewall PSI
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 11:16 PM   #24 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,240

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,723 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shortie771 View Post
yep, same page I linked
We were posting at the same time. I just spent longer looking up quotes and links.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 11:18 PM   #25 (permalink)
Eco Sol
 
Shortie771's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 343
Thanks: 24
Thanked 88 Times in 52 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
We were posting at the same time. I just spent longer looking up quotes and links.
Ah, didn't look at the time stamps. Thanks for the more informative post btw.
__________________




Best Tank = 42.72 mpg (in the 94 Del Sol)

CR-Z Current Mods:
Max Sidewall PSI
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 05:55 AM   #26 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,240

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,723 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shortie771 View Post
Ah, didn't look at the time stamps. Thanks for the more informative post btw.
Was the additional information necessary? It never is, when I give it!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2013, 06:04 AM   #27 (permalink)
toc
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 179

Sonata97 - '97 Hyundai Sonata GL
90 day: 25.96 mpg (US)

Pulsar - '03 Nissan Pulsar ST
Team Nissan
90 day: 36.09 mpg (US)

Lancer - '04 Mitsubishi Lancer
90 day: 31.11 mpg (US)

Lancer 2.0 - '09 Mitsubishi Lancer
90 day: 27.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts
They didn't do a quality job on the test either, they certainly could have anticipated the lights better, and techniques such as removing engine braking by switching to neutral would have helped.
Of course, the 'busted' is likely so they aren't appearing to 'endorse' it. Is all...
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to toc For This Useful Post:
Flakbadger (06-15-2013)
Old 06-15-2013, 09:00 AM   #28 (permalink)
Always Too Busy
 
Flakbadger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 566

White Lightning - '17 Nissan Leaf SV
Team Leaf
90 day: 159.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 405
Thanked 190 Times in 134 Posts
This is by no means perfect, it's just my thoughts and feelings after watching the episode.


By saying a few simple changes will double your mileage then busting it, you are missing the point of hypermiling. While it is true that none of the drivers added 100% to their original MPG, the improvements in MPG stretched 40% to 70% from little more than driving style changes. This is really impressive because none of them are experienced hypermilers—they are doing this without coaching, and without practice. Why?
Because driving style is the largest factor of a vehicle's MPG.
This doesn't mean that eco-driving is limited to driving style. I would say the largest hypermiling tip is the following: don't drive more car than you need. The single largest contribution to my MPG was switching from a 16MPG truck to a 42+MPG car. By doing this, I have increased my fuel economy by about 263%

One of the main points of the show was driving 45 MPH on the freeway. There is a moment where Kari laughs and asks if the chain of cars in her wake is because of how she's driving (here's a hint; YES). If you have a line of cars behind you while driving, you are an idiot, not a hypermiler. Hypermiling is all about compromise; getting the best MPG while not being a nuisance on the road.
Few hypermilers drive 45 MPH on the highway, rather the takeaway from “slowing down on the highway” is that aerodynamic drag is the cube of velocity, and slowing down a bit reduces your drag a lot. Instead of driving 65-75, slow down to 50-60.

By the way, what's with this “not slowing down on corners” business? Conserving momentum is a big part of hypermiling, but driving around corners so fast that your tires squeal is idiotic, unsafe, and a waste of perfectly good tires.

Finally, it should be noted that Tory and Kari drove different vehicles, the Malibu driven by Kari gets significantly less MPG than the Focus driven by Tory, so it's kind of not a wonder Tory got farther based on the control MPG, which was SET IN THE MALIBU AND IS THEREFORE FAULTY DATA.

~Matt

EDIT: P.S. thanks for perpetuating the stereotype that hypermilers are saving gas by being socially awkward and oblivious.

EDIT 2: P.S. thanks for perpetuating the stereotype that hypermilers save gas at the total expense of normality.
__________________
Nissan Leaf driver? Join me in Team Leaf and feel smugly superior about our MPGe

Current Car: White Lightning

----------------------------------------------

Retired Car: Betty White

Last edited by Flakbadger; 06-15-2013 at 09:17 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flakbadger For This Useful Post:
Joggernot (06-15-2013), mikeyjd (06-16-2013), slowmover (06-20-2013)
Old 06-15-2013, 10:24 AM   #29 (permalink)
wdb
lurker's apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942

PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab
90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flakbadger View Post
By the way, what's with this “not slowing down on corners” business? Conserving momentum is a big part of hypermiling, but driving around corners so fast that your tires squeal is idiotic, unsafe, and a waste of perfectly good tires.
Awww, now, don't go and ruin my excuse. "No, of course I wasn't attempting a personal best on that offramp officer, that would be idiotic and unsafe. I am a hypermiler, and I was maintaining momentum in order save gas!"
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wdb For This Useful Post:
Flakbadger (06-15-2013)
Old 06-15-2013, 03:10 PM   #30 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Ok finely saw it and seems like they set that myth up for failure.

The only time I shut the vehile off and put it in park is in the drive through, other wise its in Netrual just a click away from Drive

If I wanted to I could rig up a Netrual saftey switch bypass and start the vehicle in Drive. I had one riged up on my camaro for a few weeks about 10 years ago when the Netrual safety switch circuit went out.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com