04-22-2015, 01:58 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
People tend to fear what they can't see or touch, it's natural. Or did you never had fear of the dark when you were a kid? Anyway, in my country, due to an incident that happened about 28 years ago, the Cesium-137 incident in Goiania city, many people are still skeptical about the viability of nuke power in such a 3rd-world country like Brazil.
|
We learned about that but it had nothing to do with nuclear power. I understand what you are saying but if it leads to fear it should have lead to a banning of radioactivity in medical use, something not protested anywhere. Most smoke detectors have a radioactive source inside as well. I think if we thought of nuclear power as a life saving device in the clean environment it provides maybe we could turn the current opnion which links nuclear power to nuclear weapons.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-12-2015, 01:46 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,701 Times in 1,519 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird
We learned about that but it had nothing to do with nuclear power. I understand what you are saying but if it leads to fear it should have lead to a banning of radioactivity in medical use, something not protested anywhere. Most smoke detectors have a radioactive source inside as well. I think if we thought of nuclear power as a life saving device in the clean environment it provides maybe we could turn the current opnion which links nuclear power to nuclear weapons.
|
Even though radiation can be used for medical purposes in a safe way at a highly-controlled environment, people still tend to think about Chernobyl or Fukushima.
|
|
|
05-12-2015, 03:11 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
LNG is at least cleaner than sulfur-laden bunker fuel, but is only a baby step towards clean energy. It's still a fossil fuel and contributing to atmospheric CO2 increase.
As far as nuclear power is concerned, the planet will be paying that piper long after we have extinguished ourselves as a species.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
05-12-2015, 06:30 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,002
Thanks: 8,231
Thanked 9,003 Times in 7,437 Posts
|
Xist -- Do I mind? Perhaps it's time to change my avatar. ...to 'katflattener'.
Instead of a 3rd world country, perhaps when Silicon Valley ups anchor and goes sea-steading—they would be good candidate.
LNG ships are cool and all, but I'd like to see Natural Gas powered zepplins. Don't you get lift if it's not compressed?
|
|
|
05-16-2015, 11:17 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,701 Times in 1,519 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO
LNG is at least cleaner than sulfur-laden bunker fuel, but is only a baby step towards clean energy. It's still a fossil fuel and contributing to atmospheric CO2 increase.
|
At least a transition from fossil Natural Gas to biologically-sourced methane is technically viable.
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 05:03 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,002
Thanks: 8,231
Thanked 9,003 Times in 7,437 Posts
|
A transition from gases to sail (hybrids) is also technically viable.
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 08:18 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,308
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,579 Times in 2,842 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO
As far as nuclear power is concerned, the planet will be paying that piper long after we have extinguished ourselves as a species.
|
How?
Once the fuel and waste isotopes are separated by recycling the waste loses 99.9% of its radioactivity after 40 year.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 09:32 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,701 Times in 1,519 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
A transition from gases to sail (hybrids) is also technically viable.
|
It doesn't seem so easy to power the modern ships with sails. Anyway, instead of some transition to wind power, an integration seems to be more suitable.
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 09:45 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
|
|
|
05-17-2015, 11:36 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,002
Thanks: 8,231
Thanked 9,003 Times in 7,437 Posts
|
Quote:
Once the fuel and waste isotopes are separated by recycling the waste loses 99.9% of its radioactivity after 40 year.
|
So—the clock is ticking?
It's Waterworld all over again:
http://i.imgur.com/w6l31.jpg
|
|
|
|