Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2017, 01:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
Eco Sol
 
Shortie771's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 343
Thanks: 24
Thanked 88 Times in 52 Posts
EPA Testing Procedures

While reading an incredible long article (more like a book) I came across a page that has some interesting information where EPA numbers come from and figured I would share it here.

Car Bibles : The Fuel and Engine

According to this, we should all feel much better about our % over EPA numbers. Especially if you own a vehicle build before 2008 because our true EPA numbers should be much lower then they are, once all factors are considered. So my REAL EPA (due to inaccurate testing) should be closer to 24.4mpg combined, instead of 28mpg. If this is true then the 41.6% over EPA I got on my last tank (personal best btw) would actually be 54.6% over EPA if adjusted to today's EPA standards.

Quote:
EPA TESTING PROCEDURES
Congress and car company lobbyists required the EPA to measure mpg figures using the following simulated real world conditions in a lab. That's right - EPA testing happens on a dyno in a lab, not on the open road.
Average highway speed : 49mph
Maximum highway speed : 60mph
Temperature : 75°F
No rapid acceleration
No air conditioning
No passengers
No rough roads
No hills
No wind
No low tyre pressures
No ethanol in gas

The first problem is the last point : no ethanol in gas. In America, it's almost impossible to buy zero-ethanol petrol - it's all E-10 (see E10 elsewhere) so you're already going to be down 5% on the EPA figures even if you could meet all the other requirements.
I also learned that the EPA ratings for European cars are higher (probably due to US NOx standards) meaning if you own a European car you probably won't get as much over EPA (if you do, you're awesome!) as you would with the same car in the US. The bar is already set higher, leaving less room for improvement.

__________________




Best Tank = 42.72 mpg (in the 94 Del Sol)

CR-Z Current Mods:
Max Sidewall PSI

Last edited by Shortie771; 04-05-2017 at 02:47 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-05-2017, 03:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,652

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 300
Thanked 1,176 Times in 806 Posts
Except they arbitrarily just reduce the actual test results a certain percentage to take those things into account. They also add stop and go to the highway test. (I don't stop on the highway until it's time to get gas or pee). See I'm the other way around, I want a real, long distance, highway steady state MPG test. Basically what a car or truck gets at a constant 65mph. Hills may hurt on the way up but they sure are nice on the way down. Technically they can actually help by basically be a forced pulse and glide.
Overall the rating is good, many people get worse MPG but the few here show they could actually beat the numbers with some thought and attention. They do need to fix the manual transmission forced high rpm shifting penalty. If you want to be the cool guy beating the EPA rating by the most get a manual because they make the testers drive like a moron with the shift points.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2017, 09:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
You only need to look at my sig to see how wildly variable EPA/NEDC numbers can be, same driver, different cars, almost a 100% spread
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2017, 10:03 PM   #4 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,181

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,525 Times in 2,799 Posts
Isn't their highway testing speed kind of unrealistic too?
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2017, 10:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
Eco Sol
 
Shortie771's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 343
Thanks: 24
Thanked 88 Times in 52 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Isn't their highway testing speed kind of unrealistic too?
Completely unrealistic! Most highway speeds around me are 75mph. Heck, the back road I live off of has a speed limit of 60mph.
__________________




Best Tank = 42.72 mpg (in the 94 Del Sol)

CR-Z Current Mods:
Max Sidewall PSI
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2017, 01:58 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Antwerp (Belgium)
Posts: 272

SUVcruiser - '07 Ssangyong Kyron 2.0 XDI
90 day: 42.55 mpg (US)

SUVcruiser year 2017 - '07 Ssangyong Kyron 2.0XDI
90 day: 42.55 mpg (US)

Hybridcruiser 2023 - '13 Volvo V60 D6 AWD
90 day: 123.84 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 64 Times in 51 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shortie771 View Post
I also learned that the EPA ratings for European cars are higher (probably due to US NOx standards) meaning if you own a European car you probably won't get as much over EPA (if you do, you're awesome!) as you would with the same car in the US. The bar is already set higher, leaving less room for improvement.
So does this mean that i aim awesome
__________________
Drive smart, save fuel, save money, spare the enviroment

But keep having fun!
I can drift



Previous car. SUV. From 2011+ 10l/100km to 2017 5,516l/100km.
2017 without holiday: 5,397l/100km
EPA Rated average: 8,1l/100km

Current ride: plug in 285hp hybrid
EPA Rated average: 2,8l/100km
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2017, 02:35 AM   #7 (permalink)
Eco Sol
 
Shortie771's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 343
Thanks: 24
Thanked 88 Times in 52 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimV View Post
So does this mean that i aim awesome
Precisely! Way to go

__________________




Best Tank = 42.72 mpg (in the 94 Del Sol)

CR-Z Current Mods:
Max Sidewall PSI
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com