Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-14-2012, 06:09 AM   #11 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,631

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
PV=nRT

text

__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-14-2012, 07:35 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Ed-in-Maine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Maine
Posts: 69

Iceberg - '02 Ford F250 XLT
Pickups
90 day: 18.3 mpg (US)

Tool - '08 Toyota Matrix XR
Team Toyota
90 day: 43.15 mpg (US)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 18 Times in 7 Posts
I ran N2 in the tires of an RX7 Spec racer back in the early 1990's. It was an experiment. In racing conditions i.e. big fluctuations in tire temperatures it helped since the N2 didn't change pressure as much due to temp. SO it saved a ton of messing around to get the tires pressure set up. But back then it was expensive an not easy to get.
Today in everyday street cars, I suspect like others have said it's all about marketing. I'm not sure half the population even knows what a Turbo is and don't get me started on this "i" nonsense.

But all else being equal I'd take it. I've have no problem telling the service center NO to all the other BS things they would like to charge for.
Ed
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2012, 08:41 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
basjoos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088

Aerocivic - '92 Honda Civic CX
Last 3: 70.54 mpg (US)

AerocivicLB - '92 Honda Civic CX
Team Honda
90 day: 55.14 mpg (US)

Camryglide - '20 Toyota Camry hybrid LE
90 day: 62.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 676 Times in 302 Posts
The main effects I've noticed when comparing compressed nitrogen to compressed atmospheric air is that when installed in a new tire, the tire with compressed air will lose about 10psi (when initial pressure is 60psi) over the next 6-8 months as the oxygen in the air oxidizes the interior rubber of the tire and is removed from the gas mixture inside the tire. This oxidation caused pressure drop diminishes with time and is negligible in a 5 year old tire.

The other main difference is in the humidity (dewpoint) of the gas in the tire. Compressed nitrogen is generated by boiling liquid nitrogen and so has zero water content. Most garage air compressors just compress the local atmospheric air and don't have an air dryer inline to remove the excess water. Atmospheric humidity rises as the pressure increases, so the 40% relative humidity in the garage's air is over 100% by the time the air compressor has bumped the pressure up to 140psi and put it in the storage air tank (they have to drain the accumulated water from the storage tank from time to time). This humidity drops some when you fill your tire from the storage tank, but the humidity of the air in the tire is still well over that of the initial garage atmospheric air. You can sometimes see this humidity in the air when changing tire as the garage pulls the valve stem and the air rushes out of your tire. This increased water content in the compressed air in the tire is just another gas in the mixture and will react like any other gas to temperature changes. Any corrosion it might do to any exposed steel on the inside of the wheel would end once all of the oxygen in the tire has reacted with the rubber and exposed steel.

I don't see how nitrogen could show much difference in pressure fluctuation with temperature changes when compared to atmospheric gas. All gases follow Charles's gas law and any deviations of nitrogen from that of an ideal gas would be minor.
__________________
aerocivic.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2012, 10:04 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
PV=nRT
Who are you calling a pervert?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2012, 11:05 AM   #15 (permalink)
Smash 100 MPG barrier
 
mbrac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 33

Frankie - '07 Ford Focus SEL
Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Tire Barn

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
On the other hand, how much mpg will you lose, riding around on underinflated tires until you can get into the dealer to have them inflated with pure nitrogen, instead of the 80% nitrogen you can get everywhere?

And I bet the dealer won't inflate them beyond the too-low manufacturer's recommended pressure, either.
I got my tires at Tire Barn - I think it's a national chain - but they will let you inflate yourself to what ever pressure you like - I run mine about 5-6 lbs. over manufacture recomended - just saying.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2012, 01:04 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
I'm having a tough time accepting serious improvements from N2 over (dry) air - given the equally common air on the outside of the tire.

Water vapour will make a difference, especially when it transitions between the gas and liquid phases due to temperature.


One of my previous cars sat mostly disused for nearly 2 years.
Its rear tires stayed on long enough to show signs of rubber rot and cracking on the outside , but when they got replaced, the insides were just about as pristine as the new tires.


Why not fill up the tyres with atmospheric CO2

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com