04-02-2012, 07:37 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Now SHE'S an Ecomotorist!!!
(except for the 4 kids part)
93-year-old Florida woman retires her ’64 Mercury after 576,000 miles on the road.
Kept that thing outta the landfill for quite a while!
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-03-2012, 01:44 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Too bad she didn't know when to retire from driving.
Keeping a gross polluter on the road is not exactly a good idea though.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
04-03-2012, 02:13 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
EcoMod Proof of Concept
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chilliwack B.C. CANADA
Posts: 245
Thanks: 81
Thanked 85 Times in 45 Posts
|
#1 Comet Caliente is a very collectible car.
#2 A car with 576,000 miles on it driven by the same person has most likely been driven economically or it would not have survived.
__________________
2000 Insight MT 106K Citrus A/C
|
|
|
04-03-2012, 07:41 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder
Too bad she didn't know when to retire from driving.
Keeping a gross polluter on the road is not exactly a good idea though.
|
She did know, and took herself off the road when the time came.
"Gross polluter"- I bet it wasn't the dirtiest thing on the road by a long shot.
|
|
|
04-03-2012, 10:13 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
A gross polluter versus having [potentially] owned 4-5 other cars over the same period? Must be new to this. I think someone needs to look into embedded costs. A car like that could easily have been tuned to meet 1979 standards. By definition, that would not be "gross", and, as above, she obviously drove in an economical manner. Something else lost on those new to driving for economy. Her overall cost, as well as the indirect cost to society, makes this a case of having been highly economical as well as low polluting.
.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-04-2012, 01:00 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sw Washington (state), a little north of Vancouver
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 298
Thanked 122 Times in 88 Posts
|
Has anybody done a study how how much POLLUTION it takes to build new cars, and all the EARTH aspects of having networks of dealership buildings, etc...versus running one car very long term?
How many typical cars would the AVERAGE person had all during those many years?
Think of all the plastics! Is anyone much trying to recycle THAT in cars?
Think of all the trouble it takes to make, and maintain disc brakes.
It is too easy to paint all earlier cars as EVIL in this PLASTIC world we have made!
Too easy just to buy more new plastic.
Probably get some 'haters here; just felt like some older cars always get the short end of the stick; older cars can be modernized w/o doing the throw away society thing!
I feel almost Frank like right now!!!
__________________
06 Chev MonteC JG#24tribute car 30mpg 00 Honda Insight 63MPG 98 Buick Park Ave3.8 33MPG 89 Toyota Corolla wag 60MPG so far 81 VW Rabbit diesel pu 50MPG+ 80 Mercedes 240D stick 30-ish 90 vette 6-speed,29ish 07 Honda ST1300 55MPG 83 Honda 650 GL 64MPG 19 Suzuki dr200 88MPG23 HondaGrom?+Tow K10D Sub 26mpg NEVER,NEVER GIVE UP!
PUMP THOSE TIRES UP!
DRIVE IN YOUR SOCKS FOR SENSITIVITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SLOW DOWN AND SMOOTH UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 01:13 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
herp derp Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by larrybuck
Has anybody done a study how how much POLLUTION it takes to build new cars, and all the EARTH aspects of having networks of dealership buildings, etc...versus running one car very long term?
|
i would imagine the correlation would be very similar to the cost of ownership.
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 02:28 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
5 Gears of Fury
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
|
Man she is a pretty cool old lady! Plus you have to remember that in 1964 that would have been considered a small, economical car. I bought an old magazine ad for a 1968 Nova I had years ago, and the gist of it was "Don't worry, even though it's small, it's still safe". '68 Nova isn't small! But given the mindset of the era, I bet when she brought it home it was the smallest car on the block.
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 03:20 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 540
Thanks: 30
Thanked 190 Times in 110 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by larrybuck
Has anybody done a study how how much POLLUTION it takes to build new cars, and all the EARTH aspects of having networks of dealership buildings, etc...versus running one car very long term?
How many typical cars would the AVERAGE person had all during those many years?
Think of all the plastics! Is anyone much trying to recycle THAT in cars?
Think of all the trouble it takes to make, and maintain disc brakes.
It is too easy to paint all earlier cars as EVIL in this PLASTIC world we have made!
Too easy just to buy more new plastic.
Probably get some 'haters here; just felt like some older cars always get the short end of the stick; older cars can be modernized w/o doing the throw away society thing!
I feel almost Frank like right now!!!
|
Im with you here. I have always felt better about owning an older car versus buying new cars periodically. People always ask how many miles I have on my car (165,XXX) and they act like anything over 80,000 miles is somehow "old". My Del Sol had over 250,000 miles and its still running strong today with the new owner.
No matter how inefficient your car is, keeping it for 560,000 miles is way better financially and environmentally than buying a new car every 30-80k miles like most people do (and the car companies want you to do).
|
|
|
04-04-2012, 09:37 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
|
Not to mention tying up capital, being indebted, etc. There are better things to do with money.
Hell, how do you think she got all those husbands? Glenlivet ain't cheap, kids!
.
|
|
|
|