Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2013, 03:50 PM   #11 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
Keep in mind, the air affected by your mod extends up several feet above and around, so unless your leaf blower was originally used on the set of the movie "Twister", it really won't tell you much.

I think the reason your tufts point forward is due to your lack of a smooth transition, your flat wing creates this by default. I think it helps control the air in a good way for you. Short of building a complete cap, this seems to be the best you can achieve.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-19-2013, 02:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
.....unless your leaf blower was originally used on the set of the movie "Twister", it really won't tell you much.
Yea, could be right.

I think you would need another large fan behind the truck for drawing air in.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 12:01 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 47
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I tested different wing angles today. I built adjustable braces and found a hill that is .9 miles long. My procedure was to put it in neutral at a mile marker at the top of the hill while traveling 55 mph, and then see how much speed I gained by the bottom. To make a long story short, at the low and high end of my adjustments I could reach 60.9 mph, but I found a sweet spot right around 10 degrees that would take me to 62.8 mph. I made about 20 runs in order to be sure my results were repeatable.

In my final run I removed the wing entirely and hit 65 mph.

Back to the drawing board.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bruce For This Useful Post:
ChazInMT (04-23-2013)
Old 04-23-2013, 02:39 PM   #14 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce View Post

In my final run I removed the wing entirely and hit 65 mph.


Well I think it's fantastic that you got out there and really put it to the test, unlike so many who just hem and haw and never try to discover the real results with a legit test.

Ten stars for you!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2013, 06:18 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce View Post
In my final run I removed the wing entirely and hit 65 mph.
Just my two cents, perhaps you are befitting from some down-force which has yet to be measured.

I'd rather have down-force than any kind of lift in a pick-up truck.

Next ice storm, just see which vehicles are in the ditch on the side of the road.

In SE Michigan they will be pick-up trucks (suffering from tail lift) and a few surviving Geo Trackers which are short wheelbase and perhaps of the 2WD variety.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 12:06 AM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 47
Thanks: 13
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
Well I think it's fantastic that you got out there and really put it to the test, unlike so many who just hem and haw and never try to discover the real results with a legit test.

Ten stars for you!
Thanks. I'm trying to figure out where to go next. I wish I could see that study that tested pickup truck bed drag. I wonder how they built their wing and arrived at their conclusions?

kach22i - I'm purely interested in increasing mpg. I'll leave my truck at home when the weather gets bad - or throw some weight in the bed. I wouldn't want to drive fast enough in an ice storm for my spoiler to create down force. But, yes, traction is horrible in a rwd pickup with an empty bed.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 12:38 AM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Spokane Valley
Posts: 48

War Pig - '01 Ford Taurus SEL
Thanks: 3
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
I'd hate to dig up an old thread but Id like to know why this didnt work? From my standpoint theres no reason this shouldn't of worked. Is the space forward of the half-tonneau cover creating a negative pressure under the kamm back and thus making it act like a wing providing downforce or is it just turbulent drag? How could the design be fixed?

I may be able to get a hold of a Ranger and would of loved to do this to it

In advance, great job Bruce and great thread!
__________________
First: 2001 Ford Taurus Eco Build Thread

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...s-33334-2.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2016, 05:36 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gumby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Butte, Montana
Posts: 726

little jona - '91 Dodge D 250 first gen cummins LE
Team Streamliner
90 day: 23.4 mpg (US)

Little Jona airo modded - '91 Dodge RAM 3/4 TON D 250 2×4 AUTO
Pickups
Team Cummins
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

The Salted Hound Jenny. - '87 Dodge Ram 50/D-50 5sp 4X4
90 day: 20.24 mpg (US)

Jona Allison aero - '91 Dodge Ram D-250 Le
90 day: 20.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 428 Times in 279 Posts
Was the gap at the gate causing problems?
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
These values were published in Texas Tech's SAE Paper# 881874:'Pickup Truck Drag Reduction-Devices That Reduce Drag Without Limiting Truck Utility'
* For short bed pickup,drag min was achieved with a 24-inch wing @ 12-degrees ( a 19" wing @ 11-degrees was almost as low) and 1/2 tonneau cover [ back 1/2 ].
*For a long bed pickup,a 32" wing @ 8-degrees had the drag minimum when combined with the 1/2-tonneau.
*17 % drag reductions were measured.
* An 'aeroshell' provided a 20% drag reduction.
__________________
1st gen cummins 91.5 dodge d250 ,HX35W/12/6 QSV
ehxsost manafulld wrap, Aero Tonto
best tank: distance 649gps mi 24.04 mpg 27.011usg
Best mpg : 31.32mpg 100mi 3.193 USG 5/2/20


Former
'83 GMC S-15 Jimmy 2door 2wd O/D auto 3.73R&P
'79 Chevy K20 4X4 350ci 400hp msd custom th400 /np205. 7.5-new 14mpg modded befor modding was a thing
87' Hyundai Excel
83 ranger w/87 2.9 L FI2wd auto 18mpg on the floor
04 Mitsubishi Gallant 2.4L auto 26mpg
06 Subaru Forrester XT(WRX PACKAGE) MT AWD Turbocharged 18 plying dirty best of 26mpg@70mph
95Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 14-18mpg
04 Chevy Blazer 4x4 auto 16-22mpg


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gumby79 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-30-2020)
Old 11-17-2016, 03:29 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Spokane Valley
Posts: 48

War Pig - '01 Ford Taurus SEL
Thanks: 3
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gumby79 View Post
Was the gap at the gate causing problems?
Very possibly. I wonder if he did this, if it would change anything? The Salt Flat Gm Cyclone had a half tonneau but it extended down to the bed as-well.


__________________
First: 2001 Ford Taurus Eco Build Thread

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...s-33334-2.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2020, 11:54 AM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce View Post
I tested different wing angles today. I built adjustable braces and found a hill that is .9 miles long. My procedure was to put it in neutral at a mile marker at the top of the hill while traveling 55 mph, and then see how much speed I gained by the bottom. To make a long story short, at the low and high end of my adjustments I could reach 60.9 mph, but I found a sweet spot right around 10 degrees that would take me to 62.8 mph. I made about 20 runs in order to be sure my results were repeatable.

In my final run I removed the wing entirely and hit 65 mph.

Back to the drawing board.

UPDATE 2020


Was this project perhaps scrubbed prematurely because of dependence on on coast-down testing?

Would have Throttle Stop Testing or another means be a better indicator of success or failure?

__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com