Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2012, 11:34 PM   #71 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
I think George was talking about my lift from the sides idea.

As far as the taper goes, we gotta keep in mind that attached flow is not the end game, it is merely something that needs to be present in order for something to be aero optimized to minimize drag. It's like saying if you have Air you'll have a fire, well, no, you need wood and an ignition source too for a fire. With low drag, you need attached flow that is not creating havoc with vortex generation. I'm still pretty convinced that flow remains "Attached" at sub template shapes but in doing so often creates more drag by generating large vortices.

However, by keeping your cap high enough and very close to the template, I think you'll avoid a large low pressure area on top and will therefore not be trying to pull air up from the sides. Ideally, all the air just flows straight back. I think you'll get some air spilling up, but no enough to have a gruesome effect, and you're wanting the room inside anyway. Had you try to drop it to the tailgate top, I think you'd have needed the sides tapered. The Prius is definitely sub template with very little taper and some very square corners. You have great radiuses and are closer to ideal shape. A8ksh4 plus 2!

In short, fret no more, you're safe. Great Awesome JOB!!


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-04-2012, 02:21 AM   #72 (permalink)
T-100 Road Warrior
 
BamZipPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,920

BZP T-100 (2010) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 24 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2011) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 23.66 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2009) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 19.01 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2012) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 25.45 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2013) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 25.79 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2014) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.18 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2015) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.85 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2016) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 17.62 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2017) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.78 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2018) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2019) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

BZP T-100 (2020) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

2012 Scion iQ - '12 Scion iQ Base
Thanks: 3,479
Thanked 1,395 Times in 968 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to BamZipPow
You'll need to be careful with the cab to cap gap. Too close and you take a chance of them contacting each other as the frame does flex as you drive on the roads. You could incorporate a gap cover like I did on mine...
__________________
Dark Aero-The world's first aerodynamic single wheel boat tail!

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 12:09 PM   #73 (permalink)
gone
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 98

Lincoln #4 - '93 Lincoln Town Car Executive
Thanks: 72
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Here are a few ideas that may help anyone wanting to become more aerodynamic:
1. Tapering sides is as important as tapering top and bottom.
2. On a pickup, the bed is a restraint; it is hard to taper until past it.
3. Flex material between bed and cab will create a seal without damage.
4. Side skirts for higher vehicles is a must.
5. Don't forget the dimple effect. I have known for many years that making dimples or dents all over the body will increase economy. (Think golf ball.)
6. The front (grill/headlight/bumper area) needs tapering forward to cut the wind, but I doubt that there is much improvement versus cost benefit to trying to change a windshield angle. It is already angled more than the front end.
7. If there is plenty of weight and downforce at speed, then a lifting wing may decrease rolling resistance and increase mileage.

Hope that helps some.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 05:32 PM   #74 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central NY
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
I thought the golf ball dimple idea was debunked on a non-spinning surface?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 07:50 PM   #75 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 668 Times in 357 Posts
ACEV, your credibility was shot at golfballs. Nothing personal.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 11:31 PM   #76 (permalink)
B.O. Zen
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 208

Pickup - '99 Toyota Tacoma 2wd, Regular Cab, Short Bed
90 day: 34.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 130
Thanked 140 Times in 59 Posts
Thanks for the posts, guys!

I picked up a test batch of resin, hardner, twill weave glass, and some matting that, per a short demonstration by the nice fellow at TAP Plastics, added 10x rigidity to the piece:



Seems that I will need ~3 gallons of resin for this, given it's size. What's the best way to do the seams where sheets of cloth meet? The cloth is about 3' wide, so I'll have several seams along the shell. Should I sand the foam a little lower where the sheets meet so there isn't a rise that I have to body-fill around? That makes sense to me...
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 11:37 PM   #77 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central NY
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
The chopped strand mat that I'm familiar with is not compatible with epoxy resin, and frankly I think using both cloth and mat, (if compatible), is overkill.
Making a trench in the foam where the cloth overlaps seems like a good idea.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JRP3 For This Useful Post:
a8ksh4 (10-04-2012)
Old 10-04-2012, 11:43 PM   #78 (permalink)
B.O. Zen
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 208

Pickup - '99 Toyota Tacoma 2wd, Regular Cab, Short Bed
90 day: 34.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 130
Thanked 140 Times in 59 Posts
The mat stuff is "coremat", not chopped strand. It's polyester impregnated with some sort of microspheres. It's designed to NOT soak up a lot of resin, add thickness, and prevent flex.


That said, I'm leaning away from using it. I think that this will be plenty rigid, just using a layer of glass on top and bottom of the foam.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 11:44 PM   #79 (permalink)
ron
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: slo county ca.
Posts: 277

double eagles - '99 Dodge ram slt
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
so why don't you use the red neck fiberglass and prefect the install, cost 30ish bucks and if you have to make any changes its not going to cost you an arm our a leg. plus you can glass over it with the real stuff later
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 11:50 PM   #80 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central NY
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
OK, I'm familiar with coremat, and you definitely don't need it, you already have a thick foam core. I also don't think you need to do inside and outside with cloth. I'd just do the outside with cloth and the inside with just resin, you can always add cloth to the inside if you think you need it, but I doubt you will. I'd also sand the foam with 80 grit or so to give a better "tooth" for the resin to grab, since it's a mechanical bond not chemical.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JRP3 For This Useful Post:
a8ksh4 (10-05-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com