Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-29-2012, 03:53 PM   #11 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Welcome! Go up to the top of the page and click on "garage," then "add new vehicle" and go from there. Then join the Subaru team because that's where the cool wagons hang out.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-29-2012, 04:39 PM   #12 (permalink)
Saturn Freak
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond
Posts: 51

Freddy - '95 Saturn SL2
Team Saturn
90 day: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 16 Times in 8 Posts
Another thought occurs. I apologize for focusing so much on engine/trans swaps when they're so far down your list, but I think this one's worth looking into. The EJ series engines can interchange heads and long blocks. Apparently the EJ20 engines have too small a bore and will cause weird combustion chamber issues with your heads, but the EJ22 engines work great for this. You could get an EJ22 short block and some high-compression pistons (to compensate for lowered compression from the swap). This would allow you to retain the higher flow of the EJ25's heads, but with the reduced displacement and friction of the EJ22. This can all be done with your stock wiring harness and ECU. If you've got the experience, a little help, and a good shop for it, the whole thing could probably be done in a weekend. On my side of the continent, the whole engine can be had for $300 according to car-part.com .

The '96 Outback I had had the 2.2 SOHC engine, and it was a really solid engine. You might also look into swapping the whole thing, as the SOHC heads were less problematic and produced less friction, though they do take some power away due to reduced flow.

Good luck with this thing. I'm really interested in seeing how it turns out.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2012, 12:46 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 80

Doug - '03 Chrysler PT Cruiser Base
90 day: 31.16 mpg (US)

DR 350 - '92 Suzuki DR 350 S
90 day: 61.09 mpg (US)

Sid the Sloth - '82 Honda Civic CVCC Wagon
Last 3: 35.93 mpg (US)

Rocky - '92 Daihatsu Rocky
Last 3: 24.97 mpg (US)

Mick - '97 Jeep Cherokee XJ UpCountry
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I'm pretty sure that the 2.5L Outbacks of that time had the same rotors as the 1st gen Foresters which would make them 276x24mm rotors which will not fit under 14" rims. You may be stuck with 15" ones.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com