Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-16-2013, 09:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 54.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
Protruding A-pillar for better aero

When I saw an article about the 2015 Honda Fit I couldn't help but notice how far the A-pillars protrude forward compared to the glass. As if the front windshield is lowered, so the edges stick out forward.

At first I thought it to be strange. It could not be very aerodynamic?
But it claims stunning FE in hybrid form.
No doubt they put it in a windtunnel and deliberately designed it this way.

Then I saw other cars with the exact same feature, the Mercedes-Benz CLA sedan and their A- and B class, and in fact many other.
The Seat Leon even hides the windshield wipers in the A pillar!
Even my own Insight has this feature, though very shallow except on the base of the pillar.

So why does this work?
I think it does 2 things: it helps push the air over the car rather than curl sharply over the A-pillar, and when it does the latter it will not begin as laminar flow, so it should go smoother.
People have experimented with vortex generators over the A-pillar; I believe protruding the edge has the exact same effect.

I would be interested in retrofitting/augmenting this feature.
I'm not the first though; at least
Aeromodder has mentioned a plan to add rails.

Any thoughts?

__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-16-2013, 10:39 AM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Aerohead has mentioned in the distant past about a device to aid boxy things- like semi-trailers- that consists of a quarter round length mounted such that it stands proud of the front surface and flush with the sides/top. It traps a "stagnant" bubble in front while promoting ordered flow past it to the sides/top.

All indications are that these types of "A" pillars are basically doing the same. Of course since they are angled back on the cars it's not so much a stagnant bubble as the bulk of the air mass is going up and over, but I suspect there are "stagnant" or probably more like sliding zones along the fronts inner to the pillars and the flow to the sides is orderly.

That posit makes sense to me as evidenced by the A-pillar wiper parking, which would be aero disaster with A-pillars that are flush to the windshield.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 08-16-2013 at 10:47 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 02:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728

05 DMax - '05 Chevrolet 2500HD
90 day: 18.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
While for slightly current reasons, this reminds me of the roof rails that Nascar uses.
Wonder it I could use some landscape edging.......
__________________



I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
21,000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 02:21 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 54.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Aerohead has mentioned in the distant past about a device to aid boxy things- like semi-trailers- that consists of a quarter round length mounted such that it stands proud of the front surface and flush with the sides/top. It traps a "stagnant" bubble in front while promoting ordered flow past it to the sides/top.

All indications are that these types of "A" pillars are basically doing the same. Of course since they are angled back on the cars it's not so much a stagnant bubble as the bulk of the air mass is going up and over, but I suspect there are "stagnant" or probably more like sliding zones along the fronts inner to the pillars and the flow to the sides is orderly.
Exactly. The trapped, or slightly thicker than usual layer of 'slow' air if you will, also makes the hood to windshield transition more smooth, and maybe that's why you see this feature more and more pronounced with the boxier new cars, as their windshield is steeper.
When the edges are wider at the bottom that would have the same effect as if the windshield were tilted slightly more horizontally.

Another plus is that the A pillar can be thicker and stronger this way without impairing vision.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.

Last edited by RedDevil; 08-16-2013 at 02:48 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 11:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,702
Thanks: 8,146
Thanked 8,925 Times in 7,368 Posts
My 1958 VW convertible was like that. The main thing I noticed is snow couldn't slide off, so it built up and tried to strangle the windshield wiper.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2013, 11:17 PM   #6 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
That's because the windshield was so cold due to the famous VW defrosters.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com