Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2011, 11:01 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Columbus, Ga
Posts: 154

Whitey - '10 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 33.74 mpg (US)

Hershey - '13 Nissan Altima SL
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

Midas - '10 Toyota Prius two
Thanks: 15
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
Pulse and Glide Strategies

With my manual truck, I've been P&Ging from 65MPH to 40MPH which is the speed limits for the roads I use. But how do others execute their P&G? I've been accelerating to 65 and then coasting down to 40, but should I be focusing more on the geography for my P&G?

__________________


Check out my facebook page, if you feel like watching my progress.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/MPGran...007268?sk=wall
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-03-2011, 11:54 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
5speed5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Los Alamos, NM
Posts: 134

TBSS - '08 Chevrolet Trailblazer SS 2WD
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '09 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 22.96 mpg (US)

Big Blue Hippo - '06 Chevrolet HHR 2LT
90 day: 45.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
I definitely use geography when P&Ging. I pulse up hills then begin gliding just prior to cresting the hill. I don't really use P&G on the pure flat sections of road (of course there's not much of that around here).

(BTW, I just got my HHR and have only started hypermiling with it. The average you see in my signature is from two tankfuls driving 70-75 mph to get the HHR home before dark (bought it in Phoenix, AZ). I've now got ~470 miles on this tank and my car's computer says 41.1 mpg which is getting near double the EPA combined mpg. With a 16 gallon tank, I should have no problem getting over 600 miles on this tank.)
__________________
Daily driver:

Last edited by 5speed5; 10-03-2011 at 10:29 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 12:00 PM   #3 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,244

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 259
Thanked 803 Times in 391 Posts
I would not Push so high speed, because in most cases you come down from 65 very fast. My usual push top speed is 55 MPH and the low figure 47 MPH. If you are in a downhill you can make the push little bit higher speeds.

I have also find it like so that I try avoid doing pushes in "steep" uphills. I usually try to glide them up with minimum load. If I do a push in a uphill I try to do it in the centre of the hill so I only need one push.

I would also suggest trying out the search button. There are lots similar topics already .
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 12:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
25 mph is an awfully wide speed range. I like a 15 mph range better - like 40-55 or 45-60. With a truck's aerodynamics, 65 is going to be dragging you down a lot.

Do you have a gauge (scan or ultra)? They help immensely for fine-tuning p&g. If you do, use ~75 LOD for the pulses. Focus on keeping the trip average ticking up with each p&g cycle.

I generally do uphill pulses, like 5speed5 described. I start pulsing at the bottom right as the hill starts to drop your speed. Start coasting just before the crest. You can maintain a more steady speed this way. You're pulsing and gliding your potential energy instead of kinetic energy.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 12:48 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
I'll add the idea of "swooping", which is accelerating as you near the bottom of a hill *if* it is followed by an uphill; or a long glide. Climbing hills is best with holding the throttle constant (if possible) and let your speed drop as you climb. Think of how you would ride a bicycle.

So, for me accelerating uphill is not good. So, using elevation changes is great to extend the glide, but depending on the type of driving, I'd add swooping when appropriate.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 01:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
I won't necessarily accelerate up the hill, but power up the hill at optimum BSFC. If that means accelerating, then I put in some glides as appropriate. If it means losing speed, I do that. If it means losing too much speed, downshift and attack the hill faster next time.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (10-04-2011)
Old 10-03-2011, 03:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Diesel_Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194

White Whale - '07 Dodge Ram 2500 ST Quad Cab 2wd, short bed
Team Cummins
90 day: 37.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
As someone who grew up in the Appalachians and now lives in central Indiana, I think it's important for this discussion to remember that different people have different definitions of the word "hill".

I suggest that one should probably drive steep hills differently than lesser grades (such as a overpass).

Where I drive here in IN, all we have a those lesser grade, and most of the time it's level-up-down-level again. Here's my philosophy as far as those go: I try to maximize the amount of "pulse" I have on the upward grade and maximize the amount of "glide" I have on the downward grade. Generally that means timing things so I end my pulse at the top of the "hill". Depending on the length of the "hill" that may mean starting a pulse at the bottom or maybe not.

Of course, all this depends on traffic too.
__________________
Diesel Dave

My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".

1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg

BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 06:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
I'll add the idea of "swooping", which is accelerating as you near the bottom of a hill
I do that when approaching bridges or overpasses.
Accelerate on flat grond, coast up trading speed for height, and then down again picking up speed for a long coast.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 06:32 PM   #9 (permalink)
F8L
EcoModding Apprentice
 
F8L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 152

F8L's 2012 Prius - '12 Toyota Prius Three with Solar Roof
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 34 Times in 25 Posts
I use the same technique as euromodder. With enough overpasses on your commute this can dramatically enhance your overall mpg for that tank.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2011, 12:52 AM   #10 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
60-45, or 55-40. Better yet, find roads where you can P&G 40-25.

__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com