Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2014, 12:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
kir_kenix
 
kir_kenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Emerson, Ne
Posts: 207

1997 Chevy s10 - '97 Chevy S10 WT
Pickups
90 day: 32.71 mpg (US)

1997 Ford Escort - '97 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
Last 3: 32.29 mpg (US)

Razz - '97 Yamaha Razz
90 day: 109.57 mpg (US)

2004 Ford F250 - '04 Ford F250 XLT
90 day: 16.32 mpg (US)

2000 S10 4.3 - '00 Chevrolet S10 W/T
Pickups
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)

2010 corilla - '10 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 32.82 mpg (US)

'Yota - '22 Toyota Rav4 LE
90 day: 37.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Question regarding high(er) idle

I know this is a long post and I apologize in advance. I wanted to give enough info so I could rule out as many issues as possible. If anybody has any idea why my idle has increased 100ish rpms or point me in the direction I should investigate I would appreciate it.

I have been driving and logging the data on my 1997 Chevy S10 for over 70,000+ miles now, and thought I was pretty familiar with it. I noticed several tanks ago that my idle had increased from 925-950 rpms to around 1,000-1,025 rpms on a fully warmed up engine (whether coasting or in neutral, clutch out at a stop). This could have been going on for a long time, but I rarely idle for any length of time in closed loop, and if I coast with the engine on I don't usually pay attention.

I still didn't really think it was a big deal because the weather has been cold, and I've been running high blends of ethanol. I have read before that running higher blends of ethanol can, in some vehicles, cause a slightly increased idle because the CPU compensates in different/strange ways. I don't know if this is actually true, but I just assumed it was by what my Scangauge reports.

However, I happened to find some baseline information from when I first set up my Scangauge April, 2011 with nearly identical temperature to today. With identical (within 2*F, within 50ft elevation) outside temperature, running e-10, I noted that my idle was averaging 925 rpms with the engine at 198*F and I was burning .4 gallons per hour. Today with the truck (e-10 in the tank again) at 198-199*F I was running an idle of around 1025 rpms and burning .4-.5 gph.

On my baseline 3 years ago I had recently replaced the plugs, wires, 02 sensors, coils, fuel filter, air filter, TPS sensor, and ran some Seafoam through the engine via vacuum line. I just recently swapped out plugs and performed another Seafoam treatment at the end of March. Tests are about as identical as I can make them 3 years apart aside from the wear and tear on the engine and components I installed. I do now have a WAI, but intake air temperatures were within 10*F on both tests.

My first thought is that one of my 02 sensors is probably going wonky. No CEL yet, but one or both could be getting there. Before I go and put in new O2 sensors is there something else I should be looking at? I did not log the TPS reading in 2011 unfortunately, but it is reading 1-2 right now. I have an OBDII diagnostic tool that allows me to capture a "snapshot", but I really don't know what I should be looking for specifically, because I don't have anything to compare it to.

Anybody experience anything like this in the past? Any likely culprits that I may be overlooking? 100ish rpms probably isn't the biggest deal in the world, but it is causing the truck to burn that much more fuel. If its something as simple as tossing on a new TPS or 02 sensors I would be fine with that, but hate to swap them out if there is something else I should be looking for.


Last edited by kir_kenix; 04-18-2014 at 12:29 AM.. Reason: typing skills suck
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-18-2014, 12:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
One time I had higher than usual idle speeds caused by a failed engine-to-chassis ground strap. Another, a gooped-up IACV.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2014, 01:24 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
Vacuum leak somewhere will cause high idle and sometimes no other problems. The air just is bypassing the throttle but the fuel injection just adds the gas necessary to keep the mixture right.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2014, 04:13 AM   #4 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Well the first two responses cover what I would start with (vac leak and idle air control)
__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2014, 08:52 AM   #5 (permalink)
kir_kenix
 
kir_kenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Emerson, Ne
Posts: 207

1997 Chevy s10 - '97 Chevy S10 WT
Pickups
90 day: 32.71 mpg (US)

1997 Ford Escort - '97 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
Last 3: 32.29 mpg (US)

Razz - '97 Yamaha Razz
90 day: 109.57 mpg (US)

2004 Ford F250 - '04 Ford F250 XLT
90 day: 16.32 mpg (US)

2000 S10 4.3 - '00 Chevrolet S10 W/T
Pickups
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)

2010 corilla - '10 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 32.82 mpg (US)

'Yota - '22 Toyota Rav4 LE
90 day: 37.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
I will trace all of the vacuum lines tonight. I did do a "once over" under the hood yesterday...checked the brake booster because I had it disconnected a few weeks ago.

Hadn't thought of the ground problem Frank! Good excuse to to the big 3 upgrade, even if that is not the problem.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 08:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
kir_kenix
 
kir_kenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Emerson, Ne
Posts: 207

1997 Chevy s10 - '97 Chevy S10 WT
Pickups
90 day: 32.71 mpg (US)

1997 Ford Escort - '97 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
Last 3: 32.29 mpg (US)

Razz - '97 Yamaha Razz
90 day: 109.57 mpg (US)

2004 Ford F250 - '04 Ford F250 XLT
90 day: 16.32 mpg (US)

2000 S10 4.3 - '00 Chevrolet S10 W/T
Pickups
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)

2010 corilla - '10 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 32.82 mpg (US)

'Yota - '22 Toyota Rav4 LE
90 day: 37.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
I traced all the vacuum lines last night...sprayed water from a squirt bottle to see if it was getting sucked in anywhere. Monday I think I'll upgrade all of my grounds to see if maybe I have a bad connection somewhere. If that doesn't do it, I guess I'll look at the IACV.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 08:58 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,154

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 337 Times in 227 Posts
Maybe your pvc valve?
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2014, 02:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: winterpeg, manisnowba
Posts: 211

clank - '99 jeep tj sport
90 day: 17.32 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
i'd ohm the coolent sensor. to me it sounds like your not exiting cold start.

idle for most cars/trucks is normally 650-750

Last edited by baldlobo; 04-19-2014 at 02:37 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2014, 05:27 AM   #9 (permalink)
kir_kenix
 
kir_kenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Emerson, Ne
Posts: 207

1997 Chevy s10 - '97 Chevy S10 WT
Pickups
90 day: 32.71 mpg (US)

1997 Ford Escort - '97 Ford Escort LX
Team Ford
Last 3: 32.29 mpg (US)

Razz - '97 Yamaha Razz
90 day: 109.57 mpg (US)

2004 Ford F250 - '04 Ford F250 XLT
90 day: 16.32 mpg (US)

2000 S10 4.3 - '00 Chevrolet S10 W/T
Pickups
90 day: 19.4 mpg (US)

2010 corilla - '10 Toyota Corolla LE
90 day: 32.82 mpg (US)

'Yota - '22 Toyota Rav4 LE
90 day: 37.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Problem went away. Thinking I have a bad ground somewhere or the IACV is on the fritz. Idling around 900 again when I coast with the engine on. I'll look into it again if/when the high idle returns.

In positive news I just returned my first ever 40mpg tank! I think they will be few and far between because of the effort it took, but at least I know it is doable.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com