Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-11-2013, 10:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ever_green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 264

gueff - '19 Mercedes Benz A250 4MATIC AMG
90 day: 30.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 79 Times in 33 Posts
turbo Acura RDX project

Driving a 4000lbs 2007 acura rdx i can maybe do 18-19mpg if i'm lucky in the city (15 mile trip, light traffic). i have hooked up my scangauge to the rdx to monitor engine load for best acceleration. i noticed that if i use 80% engine load like i used to on the subaru the car moves really fast and the boost hits 14psi (max boost) at 2500rpm. Now this seems to be a bit extreme but then again doesn't boost improve BSFC at low rpms (eliminates vacuum and pumping loss)? but i have also learned that the car runs rich anytime the turbo is working. i tried driving to work offboost once but that did not work well, i got about 17mpg on that trip which was my worst. So i have no clue how to accelerate with this car during pulse & glide. also the onboard computer has a torque meter that shows how much torque is being sent to the wheels using bars like on a cellphone. i'm guessing this is engine load too? i can maybe get rid of the scangauge because i have no good place to mount it on this car.

i also have a couple mods in mind. i'm thinking of a front mount intercooler to reduce turbo heat and insulation pad for under the hood (keep engine temps up in winter). I am also thinking of high flow cat/exhaust to reduce any restrictions that turbo cars don't like.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-11-2013, 11:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
That is the problem with turbo gasoline engines. Unless you have a very tiny, undersized engine in a vehicle almost every thing about the turbo gasoline concept works against getting good fuel economy.
BSFC is higher on gas turbo motors, roughly 20% higher. That means it take 20% more fuel to make the same power as a N/A gas motor.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 03:44 AM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
BSFC is higher on gas turbo motors, roughly 20% higher. That means it take 20% more fuel to make the same power as a N/A gas motor.
NO you have it backwards.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 04:45 AM   #4 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
N/A engines need 0.5lb/hr per horsepower.
Turboed gas engines need 0.6 to 0.65lb/hr per horsepower.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 11:00 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ever_green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 264

gueff - '19 Mercedes Benz A250 4MATIC AMG
90 day: 30.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 79 Times in 33 Posts
ok i understand turbo engines have higher bsfc but isnt that only at wide open throttle where afr has to get really rich to control knock and temps? im interested in partial throttle or 50% throttle acceleration methods.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2013, 11:33 AM   #6 (permalink)
Adventurist!
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 144

CLaero - '97 Acura CL Premium
90 day: 34.59 mpg (US)

CR-v - '03 Honda CR-V EX
Team Honda
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts
I have been considering a k20a swap in my CRV with a turbo on it. Smaller nominal displacement (vs 2.4L) but more on demand "displacement" with turbo.

__________________
'97 Acura CL 2.2L 5spd
'03 Honda CR-V 2.4L EX 4wd Auto
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com