09-10-2017, 09:59 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Vic, AU
Posts: 27
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Reduce your Need for Headlights: Achieving Savings with Night Vision
Humans do some strange things. Most of us find it terribly difficult to break bad habits and I can only imagine how much fuel could be collectively saved if the driving populations of each nation made small, simple changes to their transportation routine.
As we know, conventional headlights can reduce mileage by anywhere between 1-5%. In 2017, however, they're not really necessary. When dark, I have therefore started using this trick and a quality pair of Armasight night vision goggles and expect that with the fuel savings they will have paid for themselves in... well, 10-20 years.
I encourage everyone to follow suit so that it hopefully catches on with the masses. While I am often on the receiving end of a lot of honking and yelling when using this technique, that's just because the poor souls don't know any better. I haven't even crashed yet. Small savings achieved by millions of motorists would add up to commendable reductions in aggregate oil consumption by consumers.
Edit: Obviously, even though this 'technique' would provide marginally improved fuel economy, it is clearly grossly illegal and very unsafe. As the last paragraph (and the price of that particular night-vision unit) should suggest, this was a joke post. Clearly I would not make a very good comedian.
__________________
Proponent for Prevention of Cruelty to Automobiles.
Last edited by ShinyMew; 09-11-2017 at 07:57 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ShinyMew For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
09-10-2017, 11:03 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,267
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
If I'm using night vision while running dark the last thing I'm concerned about is fuel economy.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-10-2017, 11:07 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
Great idea! Save money while risking your life!
__________________
|
|
|
09-11-2017, 02:50 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
The larger reason I have my lights on is so that others - those without night vision goggles - can see ME. I live in a city, so I can see fine without...but not a chance I'd go out there without them working.
If you want to save power/alternator drag, switch everything over to LEDs. I'm quite pleased with my ~$20 ebay LED headlights; they're about the same brightness as the power-hungry halogens but only use 1/4 the power. All bulbs converted over only pulls about 5 amps. You can go alternatorless if it's important enough.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Stubby79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-11-2017, 03:20 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Scotland
Posts: 654
Thanks: 36
Thanked 137 Times in 101 Posts
|
I cannot afford night vision goggles but, instead of night time lights, I use a white stick. I lean out the driver's window and stretch as far forward as I can. Must admit, it works better at city speeds than at highway speeds. I also make use of the extra light provided by other drivers flashing at me. A win win situation.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to JockoT For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-11-2017, 03:49 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Back in the day I blew out all four headlamps upon start-up in my '59 Bel Air- they went just like old-school flashbulbs- no doubt the mechanical voltage regulator was stuck. Anyway, it was the middle of the night. Luckily I had a hand-held spotlight so I did pretty much what Jocko said except it worked just fine at highway speed.
|
|
|
09-11-2017, 04:25 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
Back in the day I blew out all four headlamps upon start-up in my '59 Bel Air- they went just like old-school flashbulbs- no doubt the mechanical voltage regulator was stuck. Anyway, it was the middle of the night. Luckily I had a hand-held spotlight so I did pretty much what Jocko said except it worked just fine at highway speed.
|
"Mechanical" voltage regulator? I never paid any attention to old cars...that just sounds nutty to me!
|
|
|
09-11-2017, 04:55 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubby79
"Mechanical" voltage regulator? I never paid any attention to old cars...that just sounds nutty to me!
|
My grandfather mentioned that they had these on trains. So to control the Speed the driver would move a control-rod to the appropriate resistor needed to go at a particular speed.
If you have an alternator that spins, it's voltage will increase as rpm increases and if you went too fast obviously you would blow your globes.
I've never seen one but I'd be guessing some type of centrifugal switch to push to a higher resistor to limit current and voltage.
Yes, it's all solid state vregs now.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
|
|
|
09-11-2017, 04:55 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Three solenoids and point sets.
|
|
|
09-11-2017, 05:17 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
|
I'd think controlling the field to control output wouldn't be too terribly difficult, even mechanically.
|
|
|
|