Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2009, 09:45 AM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sheffield UK
Posts: 50
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry to bump up an older thread.
But ( cant remmember which team ) there was a motorcycle racing team that decided to install the exhaust under the seat - and it gave trememdous advantages.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-06-2009, 02:33 PM   #12 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Sure, things are a bit different when you're going 180 mph and seeking tenth-of-a-second advantages.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2009, 02:12 AM   #13 (permalink)
T-100 Road Warrior
 
BamZipPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,920

BZP T-100 (2010) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 24 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2011) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 23.66 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2009) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 19.01 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2012) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 25.45 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2013) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 25.79 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2014) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.18 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2015) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.85 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2016) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 17.62 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2017) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.78 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2018) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2019) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

BZP T-100 (2020) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

2012 Scion iQ - '12 Scion iQ Base
Thanks: 3,479
Thanked 1,395 Times in 968 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to BamZipPow
I bet that kinda heated up their rear end a little bit...kinda like putting the fire to their butt.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2009, 01:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
slipstream

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
Right now my exhaust exits right below the bumper on the drivers side. I could get it to route just above the bumper with a slight bend just in front of the muffler and a 6 inch extension. The exit would be right in the slipstream then and hence in a slight vacuum.

I would have to cut the body work which makes me uneasy with this mod.

Edit: CO poisoning isn't a problem on diesels unless they are way out of tune. Fumes wouldn't getting into the passenger compartment wouldn't be a problem anyway
The base pressure behind the 300 will essentially be at the same pressure as where the air separates.If the side tailpipe is within 6-inches of the tail,there may be little Delta-P between the two locations.Also,the side flow is dilluting the exhaust stream through mixing,which wouldn't necessarily occur behind the car,making it nastier for following motorists.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 12:53 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mwebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 513

no nickname , it's just a car - '04 volkswagen golf tdi
Thanks: 2
Thanked 101 Times in 74 Posts
just placing the exhaust tip willy nilly somewhere may put it in an area of pressure or ...
so
it would not be too hard
to measure , just get a MAP or FuelTankPressuresensor sensor from somewhere (junk yard) get the connector too ...
three pins on the MAP or FuelTankPressure sensor.
power 5v , ground , signal .
,tap into the 5volt reference in the car OR make up a 5v power supply , use a dvom or labscope on the MAP or FuelTankPressure sensor sensor signal pin
and position a vacuum line from the MAP or FuelTankPressure sensor in the car
to the area you suspect has lower "pressure " , drive the car .

not moving signal voltage will be about 4.5 volts on a MAP sensor from GM or 3 volts on a Honda MAP sensor , what ever the value
assign it to be "local Ambient Barometric pressure "

for this test ;
lower voltage is better because it will show (lower pressure),
you will be searching for the vacuum hose position that yields the lowest value

there are charts that will give up voltage vs "pressure" values.
depending on which MAP or FuelTankPressuresensor you can scavenge from ...
a FuelTankPressure sensor will have better resolution .(differences will be easier to measure and see)

or use a real pressure transducer .
or a water filled vertical "U" shaped tube with the vacuum line on one end of the "U" permanent marker graduation s ...
either way , differences will not be large
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 08:32 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
The base pressure behind the 300 will essentially be at the same pressure as where the air separates.If the side tailpipe is within 6-inches of the tail,there may be little Delta-P between the two locations.Also,the side flow is dilluting the exhaust stream through mixing,which wouldn't necessarily occur behind the car,making it nastier for following motorists.
I think sending more concentrated exhaust to following cars is reason enough not to do it. It could be a pretty significant difference considering that cars intake air for the HVAC at the cowl... So someone drafting you would get your exhaust in the cabin.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2009, 11:09 PM   #17 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I usually smell smokers in the cars ahead of me (with all my windows up) before I see them!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 07:21 PM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Orange, NSW, Australia
Posts: 52
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
You could buy a length of flexible tube that is aluminium, like aic con ducting in a small diameter, clamp it on to your exhaust and locate it in different spots to test.

Cost would be small, easy to remove and no damage to car if you scrap it. Do an easy experiment and tell us what happens.

All research is good research.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 09:32 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,149

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 333 Times in 225 Posts
behind the back wheel would be a good spot.
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 02:24 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
drafting

Quote:
Originally Posted by winkosmosis View Post
I think sending more concentrated exhaust to following cars is reason enough not to do it. It could be a pretty significant difference considering that cars intake air for the HVAC at the cowl... So someone drafting you would get your exhaust in the cabin.
One argument for forbidding NASCAR racers from routing the exhaust to the rear was essentially the same rationale.
In long lines of traffic on the track the exhaust would be sequestered within the ganged-wakes,concentrating as you moved further down the train of cars.
Without the dilution of the side slipstream,the gases could reach dangerous levels for the drivers.
I believe that all cars have exhaust to the driver's 'right',and open window ventilation on their 'left'.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion on tire efficiency Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 69 12-27-2014 01:17 PM
Proposed braking test: comparing tire pressure @ 50 psi vs 35 brucepick EcoModding Central 55 06-11-2011 08:29 PM
The Mechanism Behind Flow Separation LostCause Aerodynamics 46 07-15-2010 07:38 AM
Looking for a fuel efficient solution. I've got a few ideas. CuriousOne EcoModding Central 41 03-28-2009 02:46 PM
Valve stem caps that blink when your pressure is low SVOboy EcoModding Central 1 12-23-2007 03:57 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com