Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2017, 06:41 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Happydad4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3

Il Duce - '17 Fiat 500 pop
90 day: 31.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Results of hypermiling so far...

I just bought a Fiat 500. As you can imagine, I drove it like a bat out of hell using the dealer's complementary first tank and it lasted about a week. Fuelly reported that I got 27mpg. So I switched to hypermiling and the results are 33mpg.

The engine is hardly broken in and hasn't hit 1000 miles yet.

27 to 33 seems ok, I wonder if I can do better? How much can the MPG improve over time? How long does it usually take for an engine to become more efficient?

__________________
Alex
--------------------
2017 Fiat 500 pop
2012 Prius C
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-11-2017, 11:49 AM   #2 (permalink)
Volvo-driving MachYeen
 
Fingie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788

Neo Volvo - '98 Volvo S70 10V
90 day: 24.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
drive gently, don't lug the engine
__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.



With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2017, 12:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
ar5boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Sydney
Posts: 110
Thanks: 8
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happydad4 View Post
27 to 33 seems ok, I wonder if I can do better? How much can the MPG improve over time?
Check what others are doing here : Fiat 500 MPG - Actual MPG from 644 Fiat 500 owners

From my simple spindoctored mathematics, by the time the car your car is 47-years old it should be able to get up to 39.6mpg.

1970 Fiat 500 MPG - Actual MPG from 1 1970 Fiat 500 owners

Well, that's what the evidence suggests .. just wait till the car is a bit older.
__________________
2003 Renault Scenic - 30% more power with no loss in fuel economy.
1991 Toyota GT4 - more economical before ST215W engine-swap.
previous: Water-Injected Mitsubishi ~33% improved.
future - probably a Prius
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2017, 12:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Stubby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747

Firefly EV - '98 Pontiac Firefly EV
90 day: 107.65 mpg (US)

Little Boy Blue - '05 Toyota Echo
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)

BlueZ - '19 Nissan 370Z Sport
90 day: 17.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 577 Times in 426 Posts
Don't expect the engine to get any more efficient than it already is.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2017, 01:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
puddleglum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421

Rondo - '07 Kia Rondo EX
Last 3: 20.47 mpg (US)

Tinkertoy2 - '00 Toyota Echo base
Team Toyota
Last 3: 46.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubby79 View Post
Don't expect the engine to get any more efficient than it already is.
I would disagree with this comment based on my experience.
I Bought my Rondo new, only new car I've ever bought. I bought a Scangauge right away, tried hypermiling it right from day one and I've tracked every ounce of fuel I've ever used. I know it took 4-5000 miles before I could even consistently get the EPA rated mileage and more than that before I was beating it. Give it some time and get yourself some type of mileage monitoring.

__________________



Almost all my driving is done 1-5 miles at a time.
Best short trip: 2.4 l/100 km, 3.9 km
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com