Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-29-2009, 01:50 AM   #21 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: California
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Smile

Nice idea, this could be a new feature

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-02-2010, 06:46 AM   #22 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: FRANCIA
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The backpack for cars

CARUX is the ultimate solution
Its better than the roof box because the CARUX is mounted behind the car and not like a roof box on the top, it does not create any additional drag and therefore no additional fuel costs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2010, 09:55 AM   #23 (permalink)
Quest for a 400 mile tank
 
mjboks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 50

Adventure Truck - '07 Toyota Tacoma Double cab V6 TRD 4wd offroad
90 day: 19.26 mpg (US)

Commuter Bicycle - '94 Slingshot mountain bike
Thanks: 43
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
winkosmosis,no doubt,the boat will cause some interference over the roof.I do believe such a "roof rack" would however offer the minimum loss do to ,as you've mentioned,the narrow profile with very small frontal area,and drag coefficient on the order of Cd0.06.----------- The majority of the hull should see no separated flow for the entire length.------ Should the kayak be mounted on an inverted aerodynamic pylon as bombs and drop-tanks and bellytanks are done,there would be virtually no drag to speak of.No separation anyhow.---------- Some of my neighbors report that they lose "nothing" when they transport canoe and kayak on their roof.Some have actually claimed "gains."--------- I'm polite enough not to challenge their claims,and one day will test for myself,as I have both a canoe and kayak,but they usually ride inside the bed of the truck.
I'm hauling canoes, kayaks and bikes quite often on the top of my tacoma. I don't have any data to prove it but I would say if I'm only hauling a single canoe on top (upside down), I don't see much of a drop in FE. I wouldn't see any gain either though. I haul my kayaks in the vertical orientation (so I can fit 2-3 kayaks on top) and usually see a big drop in FE. My canoe however is probably the most aerodynamic (and light weight) part of the vehicle when on top.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CdA list Daox Aerodynamics 206 10-25-2023 06:32 PM
Roof rack test: quantifying the aero penalty MetroMPG Aerodynamics 30 02-10-2023 08:18 PM
How to reduce drag of surfboard roof racks? Palionu Aerodynamics 11 04-28-2012 02:15 PM
Minivan Kardboard Kammback boosts MPG +3.7% (6.6%, counting roof rack delete) MetroMPG Aerodynamics 31 05-20-2010 12:23 PM
Sources of Aerodynamic Drag in Automobiles and Possible Solutions SVOboy Aerodynamics 12 02-17-2010 02:09 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com