Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-17-2010, 08:24 AM   #1 (permalink)
Want2BAHyperMiler
 
KCF3712's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Castalian Springs, TN
Posts: 18

PeytonsLimmo - '07 Kia Spectra EX
90 day: 40.55 mpg (US)

PeytonsVolMobile - '07 Chevy HHR LT1
Thanks: 9
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Octane

First of all, thanks to all who replied to my first post, I really appreciate the advice.

Now what about octane? I found a few gas stations in my area that sell gas w/o ethanol, and I've been using it for the past few months. What are ya'lls thoughts and findings about using higher octane levels to get the extra MPG? I'm currently using 87 octane.

Thanks in advance

KCF3712

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-17-2010, 09:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510

Hot Tamale - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
Unless your engine calls for premium fuel, you will get no benefit from it and it will just cost you more money.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 09:34 AM   #3 (permalink)
ECO-Evolution
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482

Iron Horse (retired) - '97 Iron horse Intrepid

Ninja - '08 Kawasaki 250R
90 day: 76.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 44 Times in 33 Posts
Unless you are in Canada. The premium blends do not contain ethanol. Which could help mileage for some cars.

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-12202-4.html

Oops= Just saw you found some without ethanol. Depending on the car some will perform better without ethanol. If the higher octane is ethanol free then you could see a increase in mileage from lack of ethanol but not the octane.
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."


Last edited by Lazarus; 09-17-2010 at 09:39 AM.. Reason: Re read post
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 10:20 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus View Post
Unless you are in Canada. The premium blends do not contain ethanol. Which could help mileage for some cars.

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-12202-4.html

Oops= Just saw you found some without ethanol. Depending on the car some will perform better without ethanol. If the higher octane is ethanol free then you could see a increase in mileage from lack of ethanol but not the octane.
Higher Octane would make a difference. Here in Canada we have 94 octane at some stations. While there is no Ethonal in most of the blends. The higher octane burns cleaner and better. I used to run it in my parrents 98 Astro V6 and noticed it performed better might be that it burns cleaner then 87. But unless your vehicle is being tuned for it or your running some performance mods which are only used on ocasion you might not notice much.

Whats the milage on your vehicle?
__________________
2 cars one never gets driven the other is an MPG project already at 5% increase in standard driving economy CAI and Pulstar plus. Thinking weight reduction next year.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 10:39 AM   #5 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Creeper View Post
Higher Octane would make a difference. Here in Canada we have 94 octane at some stations. While there is no Ethonal in most of the blends. The higher octane burns cleaner and better.
Got any evidence to back that up? I've heard many claim this but have never seen any testing done to back it up.

I'd agree with Patrick that its a waste and is useless unless the engine is programmed to take advantage of it.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 03:53 PM   #6 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
octane is all about pre-ignition and detonation under load, and not about energy (BTU) content.

Thus, *if* your engine ECU (1) has "knock"-sensor(s) and (2) is programmed to dynamically adjust ignition timing, it is possible for the engine to "re-adjust" itself to "use" higher octane-rated fuel, meaning better power and response, but seldom better fuel economy if the BTU content is the same.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 10:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
cmj
Team Honda
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenwood
Posts: 39

Honda - '96 Honda Civic EX
90 day: 36.12 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
octane is all about pre-ignition and detonation under load, and not about energy (BTU) content.

Thus, *if* your engine ECU (1) has "knock"-sensor(s) and (2) is programmed to dynamically adjust ignition timing, it is possible for the engine to "re-adjust" itself to "use" higher octane-rated fuel, meaning better power and response, but seldom better fuel economy if the BTU content is the same.

Octane is for race cars. It allows for cooler combustion allowing more timing. The only benefit I see is the ability to add more timing, thus giving you a grunt more torque. I don't believe the gains in torque will help your FE enough to justify the higher price tag.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 03:27 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
It seems to vary from car to car, and possibly from driver to driver.

There is usually little if any MPG benefit from running higher-octane fuel. But in some cases, it does seem to make a difference.

In most of those cases, the cost difference per gallon is greater than the MPG difference, so it isn't worthwhile from a $$ standpoint. But there are a few people out there who have done what sounds like reasonably careful testing on their car and come to the conclusion that the MPG difference in their case was greater than the cost difference.

So far, I haven't seen any consistent pattern in circumstances that make it worthwhile. The only way to tell if it helps in your car is to try it and test very carefully.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 09:55 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 389

2003 Ninja EX250 - '03 Kawasaki Ninja EX250
90 day: 78.57 mpg (US)

Saturn - '99 Saturn SL1 Base
90 day: 47.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
There are a lot of confusing comments in this thread.

First off, my Ninja 250 saw almost a 10% decrease in fuel economy between 87 octane and 94 octane. Take it for what its worth.

Octane is a measurement in fuels of the resistance to preignition. Octane rating has nothing to do with the BTU output of the fuel.

If your motor can run 87 octane without detonation, you will see NO benefit from running 93. (mainly naturally aspirated motors with low compression.)
__________________
Doing my part to reduce dependence on OIL
Doing my part to reduce congestion
And enjoying it!

If you have to use your brakes, you are driving too fast!

My 101.5 MPG 2003 Kawasaki Ninja 250




Crude Oil Price Today
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2010, 03:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by theycallmeebryan View Post
Octane is a measurement in fuels of the resistance to preignition. Octane rating has nothing to do with the BTU output of the fuel.
...exactly!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
weird results: octane matters? Dean in Milwaukee EcoModding Central 33 11-15-2018 03:45 PM
ScanGauge and Octane mcrews Instrumentation 10 08-28-2013 06:22 PM
Higher Octane...bad? MadisonMPG General Efficiency Discussion 12 08-29-2012 09:46 AM
Effect of fuel octane number on FE hummingbird EcoModding Central 32 10-28-2009 12:50 AM
87 octane and retarded timing Quattro General Efficiency Discussion 4 02-20-2009 08:29 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com