Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2017, 12:00 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 22
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Scan gauge vs actual. Help.

Okay so I just filled up tonight.
Car now has only 610mi on it and I just went 310mi on 7.2 gallons.
43mpg exactly.
My driving is nearly 100% suburban city stop and go. When I go on the "freeway" it's for 5mi tops. Mostly I just stay on the side streets though.

I'm pretty happy with that. Tires were at 36psi. And most of that tank the temps were still cold, 30s mostly.

My scan gauge guessed 6.8gal so I had to adjust it to 7.2. Hopefully it keeps getting more accurate as I go.

Do you guys think it will slowly get closer and closer to the hand calc. Number?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-08-2017, 01:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Saskwatchian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 114

Eric's Explorer - '01 Ford Explorer Sport 4x4
90 day: 19.05 mpg (US)

E's V - '07 Nissan Versa SL
90 day: 33.11 mpg (US)
Thanks: 12
Thanked 25 Times in 18 Posts
In my Explorer I kept a spreadsheet that kept track of the discrepancies between the scanguage and my fill-up calculations. Combined with a speed adjust I ended up ~ -4% on the calibration, but I was still sometimes up to 5% off. It was generally accurate for most of my driving, but would under-report my fuel use a bit when I got a lot of DFCO cycles. It sometimes stayed on 0.0 LPK for most of a second after I would start accelerating again.

I didn't seem to have the same problem when using the same scan guage in my Versa.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Saskwatchian For This Useful Post:
Pryme (04-08-2017)
Old 04-08-2017, 08:07 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,016

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 26.7 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
When setting up my gauge I would go half the difference. Remember you can have fill deviations. You could also use several tanks and average them.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nemo For This Useful Post:
Pryme (04-08-2017)
Old 04-08-2017, 08:09 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 22
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Dfco is when the injectors cut fuel right? I try to coast as much as I can and it goes to 9999. I guess there is a setting if I want to set it so it doesn't go to 9999??
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 08:11 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Posts: 22
Thanks: 10
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemo View Post
When setting up my gauge I would go half the difference. Remember you can have fill deviations. You could also use several tanks and average them.
Oh that could be too. I will see what it says next fill. It gets such good mileage it will take awhile especially having another vehicle and a scooter I switch off with haha
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2017, 12:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
OBD gauges measure air, not fuel, so they can only ever be 'somewhat' accurate.

My advice is to settle on a calibration and leave it. The outright accuracy isn't really that important in the overall scheme of things. Set it to be a little on the pessimistic side so it encourages you to work a bit harder.

If you want improved accuracy and don't mind hard wiring, look into a UTComp. It measures fuel, not air.

__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 04-09-2017 at 12:08 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com