Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-10-2012, 07:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
Got MPG?
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 330

The Car - '09 Toyota Corolla CE Enhanced
Thanks: 13
Thanked 43 Times in 38 Posts
Cool Scuderi files patent for 'split-cycle' engine

Scuderi files patent for 'split-cycle' engine | Fox News

Thoughts?

__________________
2013 Honda Civic Si - 2.4L
OEM front to back belly pan from the factory.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-10-2012, 08:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Faux seemed remarkably objective for a change.

Scuderi Engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've read about this before; it was all the rage 3 years ago; supposedly they have a fistful of patents already; don't know why this last one is any different.

I've read about how it supposedly works several times and I have to admit, I don't get it. What makes a piston supercharger any better than any other sort of supercharger? On top of that, it's turbocompounded- that's nothing new. So then there's firing at ATDC, which I think is neat, but I don't understand what makes it work in this layout; why couldn't any ol' ICE have that?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 12:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
I agree.
Different? Yes. Neat? Yes. Revolutionary? Nnnooooo.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 01:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
CigaR007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 688

GreenTurtle (Retired) - '01 Toyota Echo Sedan
90 day: 44.85 mpg (US)

Zulu - '14 Honda CR-Z
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 150
Thanked 251 Times in 154 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
What makes a piston supercharger any better than any other sort of supercharger?
A mechanically-driven (belt, gear, chain) supercharger robs power from the engine. Perhaps a piston-powered supercharger provides gains in efficiency ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 02:54 AM   #5 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
And a piston is....

mechanically driven.

I don't know how the various types compare re: compressing efficiency.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 07:23 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 332
Thanks: 15
Thanked 79 Times in 54 Posts
Send a message via MSN to markweatherill
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
they have a fistful of patents already; don't know why this last one is any different.
Maybe it isn't much more than an excuse for a press release ie they need some more investment.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 07:30 AM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
That's probably it. There's supposedly "millions" sunk into it already... it would make a good Aptera engine.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 09:33 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mechman600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 1,228

Fusion - '16 Ford Fusion Hybrid SE
Thanks: 190
Thanked 275 Times in 168 Posts
A piston compressor doesn't give you a chance to cool it down with an intercooler first. That can't be good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 10:00 AM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 189
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
I've talked with these guys at length at the DC auto show. They do already have a fistful of patents. I'm wondering if they keep filing for new and improved patents to keep the technology from becoming openly available when patents expire. I'm wondering if they just want too much $$ to license the engine.

Some of the efficiency comes from:

A) Super high compression. Like 15:1 or greater in the second cylinder. And different comp. ratios for compression stroke and power stroke (like atkinson)
B) Firing ATDC (don't have to compress during combustion)
C) The potential of an Air-hybrid. You can actually store the energy created under compression braking into a large tank (and feed it back into cyl #2 at a later time).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2012, 10:34 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDarwin View Post

A) Super high compression. Like 15:1 or greater in the second cylinder. And different comp. ratios for compression stroke and power stroke (like atkinson)
B) Firing ATDC (don't have to compress during combustion)
C) The potential of an Air-hybrid. You can actually store the energy created under compression braking into a large tank (and feed it back into cyl #2 at a later time).
I don't see where 25 percent more efficiency is going to come from.

a. you can run 15:1 in a traditional engine. same problems, same solutions. variable cam timing is a pretty known technology on an Otto engine, which gives pseudo atkinson already.

b. This one is REALLY weak. you can fire ATDC on an Otto. But in any case, your mean average cylinder pressures will be lower, and mileage will suffer. There is spark advance for a reason.

c. Even weaker. You can do an air hybrid using the main pistons, and you can do an air hybrid with an Otto engine. In either case all you have to is completely change the cam timing - not a trivial matter.


This new revolutionary engine looks a whole lot like a Detroit 2 stroke diesel to me.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com