Shoed Foot = Less MPG - Page 2 - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com

Recent Posts / Pics

65+ Efficiency Mods

100+ Hypermiling Tips

Glossary

		EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Shoed Foot = Less MPG

Reply

Post New Thread

Page 2 of 2

2

Old

01-30-2013, 06:45 PM

#11 (permalink)

kanoshee

EcoModding Lurker

Join Date: Jan 2013

Location: roxboro

Posts: 35

cammy - '98 Toyota Camry le
90 day: 29.18 mpg (US)

Thanks: 6

Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sven7

View Post

^^ Care to back up your opinions?

no that's why i stated them as opinions not facts.
i'm legitimately curious as to which is correct i'm aware they both work in different cases

Reply With Quote

Alt

Today

Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

>> See all the most popular projects in the EcoModding Central subforum.

01-31-2013, 10:01 AM	#12 (permalink)
PaleMelanesian Hypermiler Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Texas Posts: 2,321 PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan 90 day: 69.2 mpg (US) PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport Team Honda Wagons 90 day: 44.06 mpg (US) Thanks: 611 Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts	Well, for one thing the tires' rolling resistance goes up dramatically in cold weather. It's on the order of double from 100F down to freezing. 2nd, the engine makes more power, but on the way to doing that it also consumes more fuel. __________________ 11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles

Reply

Post New Thread

Page 2 of 2

2

Tags

barefoot, mpg, shoes

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Web
Analytics