View Poll Results: Compact or Crossover for Saftey?
|
Would stick to compact and drive safe
|
|
40 |
78.43% |
Crossover for Saftey
|
|
0 |
0% |
Would get a crossover if it had the same mpg
|
|
7 |
13.73% |
Would pay up for saftey and get a larger car
|
|
4 |
7.84% |
02-12-2012, 02:10 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5.4
Obviously larger cars will fair better in a crash vs a small car...
|
Mark Twain had something to say on this:
Quote:
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
|
Or if you want the science, see e.g. Wenzel & Ross: "The Effects of Vehicle Model and Driver Behavior on Risk"
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 05:16 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
Or if you want the science, see e.g. Wenzel & Ross: "The Effects of Vehicle Model and Driver Behavior on Risk"
|
See that the thing here in Ontario, if someone owns a large suv most (not always) they are the more calm driver (trying to save more fuel or just the fact the suv is slower) and they drive more safely, not the hothead in his small manual coupe.
And there's the cost factor that a large car here is almost twice the price of a small one (yes I know it depends) so your not going to be getting inexperienced first time drivers in massive suv's.
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 05:59 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5.4
See that the thing here in Ontario, if someone owns a large suv most (not always) they are the more calm driver (trying to save more fuel or just the fact the suv is slower) and they drive more safely, not the hothead in his small manual coupe.
And there's the cost factor that a large car here is almost twice the price of a small one (yes I know it depends) so your not going to be getting inexperienced first time drivers in massive suv's.
|
I actually see the opposite behavior here. Those with bigger vehicles tend to try and bully their way down the road, whether it be merging into gaps that are too small or refusing to let other cars onto the road.
And in terms of speed, I get passed on the freeway (by an excessive margin I might add) by SUVs just as often as I do by Camrys and Priuses. I'm sorry, but 80-90 mph is not a safe, slow speed for a Tahoe, Navigator, Excursion, Escalade, Hummer, Armada, Sequoia, etc. But they drive that way anyway.
__________________
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 08:36 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sw Washington (state), a little north of Vancouver
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 298
Thanked 122 Times in 88 Posts
|
If you keep aware of whats going on around you , a small car is also a smaller target, and
can likewise avoid messes w quick evasive moves in tighter places!
I certainly think the poll shows a general preference: smaller rigs usually handle better, and are more fun to drive!
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 08:55 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Anyone who is too chickenisht to ride in a small car is also too chickenisht to get on any two-wheeler of any sort; use stairs or a bathtub; eat cheeseburgers and Doritos; or leave the house.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-12-2012, 09:24 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
|
It's about the car's design, not the car's mass. A heavier car absorbs more impact energy into the structure, and I imagine in side impact situations having the door give away more could be troublesome.
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 09:39 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 692
Thanks: 371
Thanked 227 Times in 140 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r
A heavier car absorbs more impact energy into the structure
|
You have it backwards.
F=MA
or
Kinetic Energy = 1/2MV^2
Under the same deceleration ( say you hit a stationary object ) or the same initial speed ... the more mass you have the more impact energy you have. Mass increases the impact energy not decreases it... Mass doesn't absorb the impact energy , it increases it.
A better design is a better design ... that part I'll give you ... but the mass part you have backwards.
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 09:56 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
I know a semi-driver who was hit by another semi and will be a vegetable for the rest of his life. So much for the large vehicle arms race, when you get screwed even at the very top.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-12-2012, 11:10 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r
A heavier car absorbs more impact energy into the structure, and I imagine in side impact situations having the door give away more could be troublesome.
|
Unfortunately, the data doesn't support your thinking. See the Wenzel & Ross paper, and particularly the differences between body-on-frame SUVs and unibody designs.
I also think you need to get over this fatalistic "I'm going to be hit by another car no matter what, so I'd best carry around a ton or two of armor to protect me" attitude. A good course on defensive driving weighs nothing, and will do more to protect you & your passengers than any amount of added mass.
|
|
|
02-12-2012, 11:57 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sw Washington (state), a little north of Vancouver
Posts: 1,154
Thanks: 298
Thanked 122 Times in 88 Posts
|
I love the way Frank simply lays it out!
If we worried ourselves to death about every little thing, we wouldn't have much of a life!
I've thought more than once about giving up motorcycles. But the enjoyment I get back from them is near the focal point of who I am to myself!
Yes, I know I have no protection in the natural realm of things, but if I go that way; it will have been something special to me! (a life w riding in it!)
I still shudder when I'm 5 car lengths from a stop sign w a blind hedge to the right; and a bimbo turns left off a highway totally cutting the blind corner, so if I'd been 1 second faster, and splattered oncoming like a bug!
__________________
06 Chev MonteC JG#24tribute car 30mpg 00 Honda Insight 63MPG 98 Buick Park Ave3.8 33MPG 89 Toyota Corolla wag 60MPG so far 81 VW Rabbit diesel pu 50MPG+ 80 Mercedes 240D stick 30-ish 90 vette 6-speed,29ish 07 Honda ST1300 55MPG 83 Honda 650 GL 64MPG 19 Suzuki dr200 88MPG23 HondaGrom?+Tow K10D Sub 26mpg NEVER,NEVER GIVE UP!
PUMP THOSE TIRES UP!
DRIVE IN YOUR SOCKS FOR SENSITIVITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SLOW DOWN AND SMOOTH UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|