Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2012, 09:55 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Good point, nemo. Luckily, I think he does enough static driving that the reduced rolling resistance will help tremendously. I have to drive about 80 miles to pick him up tomorrow, so I plan on leaving a surprise on his dashboard.

I think the best he's ever averaged is ~ 32 mpg... so I have a goal. I'm not a fan of his transmission, though.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-24-2012, 04:05 PM   #12 (permalink)
.
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Salt Lake valley Utah
Posts: 923
Thanks: 114
Thanked 397 Times in 224 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemo View Post
If this change does not occur your friend will just wear out the brakes sooner.
Never heard of that before. My brake rotors have recently gotten a little gummed up from crud. I guess thats what what happens when you "never brake!"
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2012, 04:56 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 238

Grasshopper - '11 Ford Fiesta SES
Team Ford
90 day: 50.37 mpg (US)

Feejer - '09 Yamaha FJR1300 AE
Motorcycle
90 day: 42.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 68
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
My wife doesn't know, but she is running around at max sidewall in her truck.

Saturday is air pressure check day around here.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2012, 05:01 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Why would you want to lessen the roll resistance of a pickup truck? Cheaper than a divorce?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2012, 06:57 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,015

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 26.7 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog 44 View Post
Never heard of that before. My brake rotors have recently gotten a little gummed up from crud. I guess thats what what happens when you "never brake!"
If Ladogaboy's friend is not aware of the change and continues to drive using the same spacial references, he will need to brake harder to stop within the same distance with the higher tire pressure. This effect becomes more pronounced the heaver the vehicle, in my experience. Not that the higher tire pressure its self causes the brake wear.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2012, 07:34 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
I like nemo's point, because it illustrates just how important proper driving techniques really are. I guess the first adjustment really does need to be the nut behind the wheel.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2012, 06:16 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Well, it wasn't as much of a success as I would have liked. I'm sure most of it had to do with driving conditions. On the same trip last week, it was dry with a slight tailwind = ~ 32 mpg. On my trip down today, it was raining with a headwind = 33.3 mpg.

I can definitely tell the difference in aerodynamics on his car, though. The difference between 55 mph and 65 mph is VERY significant. Greater than 10% according to the instant fuel gauge.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com