Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-07-2011, 08:14 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Debonair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 53

Camaro - '00 Chevrolet Camaro SS
90 day: 16.18 mpg (US)

S10 - '95 Chevrolet S10 LS
90 day: 15.84 mpg (US)

Formula - '99 Pontiac Firebird Formula
90 day: 21.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So I did some math and settled on an engine choice

I've been looking at engines to swap into the truck and the one that i was settled on was the 4.8L V8. I have since chosen for the engine to be the 5.3L V8 for the sole reason of Active Fuel Management. The 4.8L and 5.3L have essentially the same EPA ratings, but the AFM is only offered in the 5.3L and larger engines.

So I did some math and if this 5.3L came in my truck with a 4 speed automatic the EPA estimate would be about 18.7 MPG City.

Thats almost 2 MPG better than my 4.3L V6 and over 100 more horsepower (and sounds a lot better)

I plan on swapping in a 6 Speed manual and driving the way I've learned on here. From that, i could easily match my economy but plan on beating it.

Until the engine in it now goes, or i finished everything else i want to do with the truck, i'll just be saving and aiming for better numbers with what i have now

__________________
[url=http://ecomodder.com/forum/em-fuel-log.php?vehicleid=5445]
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-08-2011, 10:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
Drive less save more
 
ecomodded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,189

Dusty - '98 VOLKSWAGEN Beetle TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 60.42 mpg (US)
Thanks: 134
Thanked 162 Times in 135 Posts
It would be cheaper and faster and easier to sell your current truck with its large motor and buy the one with the best fuel mileage from the factory. Such as one with the four cylinder in it, then ecomod it, then get 30+ mpg instead of 20 mpg and enjoy 50% fuel cost savings at the pump. That is a huge ecomod
__________________
Save gas
Ride a Mtn bike for errands exercise entertainment and outright fun
__________________



  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ecomodded For This Useful Post:
Arragonis (12-09-2011), Daox (12-08-2011)
Old 12-08-2011, 10:31 AM   #3 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
A 5.3L with AFM on a 6-speed will turn some pretty good fuel economy numbers for a truck.

My long time friend has a 4 cylinder 2.7L toyota truck with a 5-speed. He has 170hp and gets 22 to 24 mpg highway.
Its good until he trys to tow something.
Loading the bed of his truck with fire wood and putting my 4x8 heavy duty utilty trailer loaded with wood behind his truck turns it into a turd.

His toyota is the best all around small truck I have ever seen. It just does bad towing, on and off road its great.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2011, 02:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 516

B2300 - '96 Mazda B2300 SE

Focus - '05 Ford Focus ST

The red car - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 6
Thanked 77 Times in 56 Posts
It's okay to be slow when hauling at max capacity. Look at the loaded big rigs that just can't accelerate like you can even loaded, you can still be safe doing this.

If you are hauling 75% of the time then maybe you have a point, but for the occasional load it's okay to slow down.

My 4 cylinder 112hp Ranger fully (over) loaded with drain rock and a loaded trailer weighs in at about a combined 5700lbs. Geez it is slow. I haul this home from the quarry 11 miles about 8-10 times a year as well as a few (over) loaded firewood and misc runs. It's fun to really rap the truck out occasionally, it's almost the thrill of being back on the racetrack again, and I dare say it's good for the truck to get a good hard run. 161,000 miles and no sign of wearing out or slowing down from it's brand new lethargic state. The good maintenace practice is really paying off.

The rest of the time I'm getting about 29 mpg.
__________________
Good design is simple. Getting there isn't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2011, 02:10 PM   #5 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Have you considered the superior Diesel choice ?

You could probably match and exceed the V8's wimpy torque output with a 4-6cyl Diesel very easily - there is a reason those big trucks have compression ignition engines.

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com