![]() |
Sorry but its the hydrogen generator again.
Hi all new to the forum and really sorry to put this as my first post. But the age old discussion of the Hydrogen generator.
I do have a different question though regarding this but just used in a different way to normaly debated one. So the verdict always seems to be as follows, draw from battery is greater than the power produced resulting in poorer fuel economy (which i agree with). Some people say the hydrogen changes the burning characteristics and this improves the efficiency which i suppose is possible although any benefit will probably be lost on the extra load on the alternator. So my questions are as follows...... 1 - What if the hydrogen generator was independant of the alternator ie solar charging battery in boot and device switched on by relay from ignition or seperate switch. A slow draw of 5 amps should last 8-12 hours depending on the battery installed. This should eliminate the extra load put on the alternator. Charging of the battery would take a while by solar but unless your putting in higher mileage you should be able to keep this topped up after school runs etc. If nothing else would this help with cold starting and running of the first few miles untill warmed up?. 2 - same principle again, but forget about improving the fuel economy. If an independant hydrogen generator was fitted that was high amp's ie 100/200amps could this be used as some kind of crude nitro burst?. Battery wont last long but neither would a nitro bottle. Would like to hear peoples opinions for the different spin on this greatly argued subject but after many hours/days/years lol of finding an answer to this age old subject not once have i heard an independant unit mentioned. The independant unit of course resulting in the extra load issue being non existant making alot of peoples argument void. :confused: |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
What would really be interesting to see would be hydrgen powered car, even from a tank of compressed hydrogen, with the engines characteristics optimized for the fuel. That would be cool.
|
OK, this is 2 days in a row with the same tone regarding HHO in this forum by somebody posting for the "first" time.....what are the odds?. Give it a rest.
I'm pretty certain this is a linkback post designed to generate interest in some schmucks Google ranking. Let this thread die with this post. DO NOT RESPOND FURTHER!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A 100hp shot of nitrous oxide will use 4 pounds in about 12 seconds. A 15lb bottle will barely get you 3 passes, and that last run will be pretty iffy. A 1.5m tall hydrogen bottle charged to 2200psi only has about 5 pounds of hydrogen in it. The typical hydrogen generator couldn't even prove a power boost to a weedeater. I bet 10 of them couldn't provide any noticeable power boost to a lawn mower or weedeater. Quote:
Water injection on a diesel is good for about 4% to 6% and an alt delete is good for between 5% to 10% Hydrogen generators are good for about 0%. Hydrogen has only been able to give a proven 3% improvement and that was with the engine being bottle fed the hydrogen. Hydrogen form a gas cylinder is way more hydrogen then you could hope to get from even 50 hydrogen generators. Quote:
Hydrogen piston engines have always suffered low volumetric efficiency. Ford built a hydrogen powered shuttle bus, no doubt with a lot of government money, they had to use a supercharged tridon V10 to make it drive like a regular diesel bus. I wish I had that much money to waste. |
|
Quote:
how about you pull your head out and use the search function ......... How come the stupid noobies don't know how to search???? First time on a forum?????? |
My question is how much hydrogen do you need to equal the energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gas?
When you can answer that question, you might understand the problem. regards Mech |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com