Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-14-2010, 08:57 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Parma, MI
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stock, short ram or cold air intake? Acura Integra GSR

I've spent hours searching and haven't come up with much. I thought short ram would be better due to drawing in hot air but some claim due to heat soak a cold air doesn't really change engine temps much.
I also read that the bigger difference is due to pipe length and diameter so a cold air makes more power because of that not where it is drawing the air from. And it makes more low end torque and power where a short ram is more for high rpm which i'm not worried about.
The stock system has an airbox with a pipe that goes down in the fender, through a resonator, and loops back up to the engine bay.
I was going to do a short ram into the stock box and remove the resonator/lower piping but now maybe it would be better to just remove the resonator for better flow?
Would changing the hose from box to intake manifold to an aluminum pipe make any difference? That is doable or so is just a drop in K&N filter. They have a 5" OD that fits but have to pay $8 shipping or a local store has a 4" that tapers down to a 3", I know the 5" is better but $14 better?

__________________
1987 Mazda RX-7 Turbo anti-eco modded 15mpg E85 300hp laptop programmable EFI
1989 Honda Civic Si-temporary "beware of dog" grill block 29mpg winter (last tank before grill block and stock underbelly pan was off b/c of quick coolant change)
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-14-2010, 08:58 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Parma, MI
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Oh and also that intakes don't make much difference on stock motors. Also a guy had an AEM cold air on his car and short ram on his wifes, only saw negligible mpg gains.
__________________
1987 Mazda RX-7 Turbo anti-eco modded 15mpg E85 300hp laptop programmable EFI
1989 Honda Civic Si-temporary "beware of dog" grill block 29mpg winter (last tank before grill block and stock underbelly pan was off b/c of quick coolant change)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2010, 09:07 AM   #3 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,554 Posts
I'd stay with the stock intake. You could route the inlet to the exhaust manifold to get a warm air intake. It works on some engines, does nothing on others.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2010, 09:16 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Zerohour's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 314

Pooparu - '01 Subaru Outback Limited
90 day: 28.12 mpg (US)

Cop Car - '94 Chevy Caprice Interceptor 9C1
Last 3: 18.48 mpg (US)

Mini - '11 Mini Cooper
90 day: 37.63 mpg (US)

Gramps - '95 Subaru Legacy Postal
90 day: 23.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 17 Times in 10 Posts
Intakes generally do improve MPG if they improve the the airflow and throttle response of the vehicle. But it stands to reason, and take no offense, the nut bolting the cold air intake to his/her car is not trying to conserve gasoline.

Intake + better foot control = more MPG.

Just like the Tesla Roadster, goes 125 miles on one charge, but drive it like a sports car is it only goes 30 miles.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2010, 10:10 AM   #5 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
A free-flowing intake can only help the airflow it it is the biggest restriction in the system. Unless you drive all the time at full throttle and redline rpm, that's not the case. The throttle is the main restriction in the system. The stock intake may be a little restrictive for the high-throttle-high-rpm condition, but if you're there, fuel economy is not a priority, is it?

A short intake is going to shift the intake resonance higher, so it'll help more at high rpm than low. Again, how much of your time is spent at high rpm? not much.

Keep it stock.

For comparison, mine is stock. I think my mileage is ok.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2010, 10:32 AM   #6 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
If you want your engine to last, don't get a K&N. They flow more air by passing more dirt. In fact they generally have less filtration area than an OEM filter.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2010, 08:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Parma, MI
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Are the AEM dryflow any good? I do want the engine to last but thought something would be better then paper ones. Will reply about the rest later, appreciate the tips but on the way out the door.
__________________
1987 Mazda RX-7 Turbo anti-eco modded 15mpg E85 300hp laptop programmable EFI
1989 Honda Civic Si-temporary "beware of dog" grill block 29mpg winter (last tank before grill block and stock underbelly pan was off b/c of quick coolant change)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2010, 09:18 AM   #8 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
Save your money. If you don't have one already, get a Scangauge or Ultragauge.

As for the filter... You might get performance gains, but not likely to see any mpg gains from a high-flow filter.
Testing a 'performance' air filter for MPG - Part 2 - MetroMPG.com
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2010, 04:34 PM   #9 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Parma, MI
Posts: 38
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks, and I do have an Ultra gauge but even the roads that appear flat are not around here so I'll have to do an average not steady state.
So would removing the resonator box make any difference in mpg? It is a restriction but how much I don't know.
I assumed aftermarket filters would filter better too, newer technology. The reason I asked about the AEM is it is not an oil filter and tests showed it filters excellent with K&N just very good but they didn't include a paper filter in the test.

Unrelated but is your 96 Civic a stock motor or a Vx? That's awesome mileage. I'm trying to balance between Hypermile and mild driving. I don't do anything that would cause extra strain on the drivetrain like pulse and glide (clutch wear.) And with the Ultra gauge at least for now I'm not doing EOC when I get to my destination either since I don't think it would read mpg anymore even if I had a kill switch.
__________________
1987 Mazda RX-7 Turbo anti-eco modded 15mpg E85 300hp laptop programmable EFI
1989 Honda Civic Si-temporary "beware of dog" grill block 29mpg winter (last tank before grill block and stock underbelly pan was off b/c of quick coolant change)
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2010, 06:18 PM   #10 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Pulse and glide is no harder on the clutch than any other shifting of gears if you are doing it right. In top gear the wheels have lots of mechanical advantage on the motor.

__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Warm Air Intakes (WAI) & Cold Air Intakes (CAI) toomuch EcoModding Central 27 11-20-2022 04:24 PM
Cold air VS Warm Air Intakes - what's the difference? deadman1474 EcoModding Central 63 03-22-2019 09:53 AM
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 16 12-21-2015 01:49 AM
Air intake on a volvo 240 (big lesson learned) FuzzyD EcoModding Central 12 07-03-2010 12:54 PM
2010 Honda Insight Intake: Ram air or just coincidence? SVOboy EcoModding Central 11 04-17-2009 08:39 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com