Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-12-2010, 02:35 AM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758

oldscoob - '87 subaru wagon gl/dr
90 day: 47.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
mythical numbers to avoid

I only came up with a few things to avoid, of course epa fuel mileage is one..as most of us under our own hoods knows.

Horspeower in general is another bad think to rely on..
I recently saw mention of "horsepower to weight" as a reminder how silly that number is: "horsepower"

I also wanted to share how I decipher a car...
ecomodder:
horsepower is often less than the torque.
mid range >4cyl:
horsepower is often squared up with torque.
race car:
horsepower exceeds the torque.

To give an idea how silly the hp number is...
my 90hp subaru at 2800 pounds can do a quarter in 15seconds as a 4x4...33.1 pounds of weight per horsepower..
the brand new 412hp mustang with just 8.8 pounds of weight per horsepwer is getting there just 2 seconds earlier...
something is way offset here...

and lastly, a figure from my dads rig..
500hp for 79,000 pounds is..158 pounds of weight per horsepower..and it will do 85mph+ loaded. I don't think a 500hp mustang could do that..

if you cannot decipher numbers for power on any given car, find out the engine and figure bore and stroke...
an inline needs a deep one in the same car weight as a boxer, in the four cyl category, the 6 and 8 can be little strokes and big bores, and vice versa, it does'nt matter..this is where weight of car comes into play...all while ignoring the hp, go by liters and weight, derive your own conclusion, with engine design, like diesel or gas etc...

that hp number is like a fantasy derived from drug addiction.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-12-2010, 02:47 AM   #2 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
Um, 15 second quarter miles with a 90 hp 4X4 at 33 lb./hp? I don't think so. The only quarter mile time I could find for your '87 wagon was 3 seconds slower at 18.7. That's a lot more realistic for a 33 lb./hp vehicle. You need a 15 lb./hp weight to hp ratio to turn mid 15s. It's simple physics, and the numbers do not lie.

And the 2011 Mustang GT will be in the high 12s, or very low 13s.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg

Last edited by SentraSE-R; 04-12-2010 at 03:09 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SentraSE-R For This Useful Post:
Christ (04-13-2010), pgfpro (04-13-2010), robertwb70 (04-13-2010)
Old 04-12-2010, 09:43 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
1/4 time improvements are not linear.

i.e. 8000hp = 4 second quarter, whereas it requires much less than 2000hp to run a 16 second time.

*not the best explanation, but the best I could do with my current brain power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2010, 11:13 AM   #4 (permalink)
Eco Dreamer
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Exton, PA
Posts: 104

Versa - '08 Nissan Versa SL Hatchback
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadisonMPG View Post
1/4 time improvements are not linear.

i.e. 8000hp = 4 second quarter, whereas it requires much less than 2000hp to run a 16 second time.

*not the best explanation, but the best I could do with my current brain power.
Actually that is a very good explanation. I ran high 16's in my stock ford taurus... I think that was 130hp or so.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 12:14 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Patrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Northern Florida, USA
Posts: 510

Hot Tamale - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 27
Thanked 96 Times in 70 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgd73 View Post
and lastly, a figure from my dads rig..
500hp for 79,000 pounds is..158 pounds of weight per horsepower..and it will do 85mph+ loaded. I don't think a 500hp mustang could do that..
And your Dad's rig has what, 1400 ft-lbs of torque?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 12:38 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
I think he means an eigth of a mile in 15 seconds...

I actually got to watch a jet-engined dragster make a run. 5.6 seconds for the quarter at 300 MPH. Loud as heck.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 08:20 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Horsepower allows you to sustain high speeds, torque gets you moving. That's why I love my V8. 245 hp in a brick doesn't make it fly (15.2 1/4 mile), but the 345 ft lb of torque kicks it off the line pretty hard.

I can get almost the same mpg as a the same vehicle with the much smaller 4.0 I6 (22-23 @ 60mph vs 20-21 @ 60mph, both around 12 - 14 city), but I can haul it from 0-60 in 6.8 seconds if I need to. Plus, the V8 never downshifts on the highway (will happily turn 1800 in OD with the TC locked doing 60 up some BIG hills), and can get into the high gears faster around town. In areas with lots of big hills, the V8s sometimes get better mileage than the 6.

Having good power AND FE is all about a good, usable, low powerband and matching the engine to the vehicle.
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 01:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
YEE HAAWWW!!!! I don't even bother looking at HP. If someone starts telling me how much HP something has I like to ask them how much torque it has and then they admit they don't know and it doesn't matter. I like having torque on tap. My truck does not care if it is empty or has 6,000 lbs in it...it still goes....it just takes a little more pedal to stop.
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 01:58 PM   #9 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
HP does not allow you to maintain high speeds.

HP, technically, is an imaginary number, created by an algebraic equation which factors torque over time.

While it does give you an easier to understand indication of the correlation between torque and engine speed, it does not "allow" for anything.

Torque at 2,000 is the same as torque at 5,000, plain and simple as it gets. But if you only had Torque figures to rely on, you'd think that engine was puny at 5,000, because it makes so much less torque (in some cases, like my 300 I6 Ford) than it does at 2,000 RPM.

The figures are simple, when you actually know what they're for.

Torque = work performed (able to be performed)

HP = Work able to be performed in a certain span of time.

They mean nothing more than that.

And NO, a 90HP Subie WILL NOT make a 1/4 pass in 15 seconds. My 92 HP Civic could barely keep 16-17second runs, and it was nearly 1,000lbs lighter.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2010, 02:00 PM   #10 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsaacCarlson View Post
YEE HAAWWW!!!! I don't even bother looking at HP. If someone starts telling me how much HP something has I like to ask them how much torque it has and then they admit they don't know and it doesn't matter. I like having torque on tap. My truck does not care if it is empty or has 6,000 lbs in it...it still goes....it just takes a little more pedal to stop.
Yeah, around 260ft lbs just off-idle will do that for ya.

I've been running around on 5 cylinders with a really bad misfire for quite awhile, and I can still hold 60-65 MPH with no problems, and tow a trailer doing it.

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suzuki Swift (1994 sedan) Coast Down Numbers wyatt Aerodynamics 18 11-24-2009 04:03 AM
Areas To Avoid In Cross Country Mpg Trips Ptero Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 8 08-23-2009 04:13 PM
Looking for outstanding efficiency numbers Ernie Rogers General Efficiency Discussion 16 05-10-2009 07:53 PM
Crunching Numbers... jdwave EcoModding Central 6 08-01-2008 06:12 PM
New EPA numbers rsx2002 EcoModding Central 7 07-18-2008 07:34 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com