EcoModder.com

EcoModder.com (https://ecomodder.com/forum/)
-   Aerodynamics (https://ecomodder.com/forum/aerodynamics.html)
-   -   Terminal velocity (THIS IS A TROLL THREAD) (https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthread.php/terminal-velocity-troll-thread-22204.html)

Christ 06-08-2012 02:05 PM

Terminal velocity (THIS IS A TROLL THREAD)
 
If a tear drop is such a great aerodynamic shape:

Why does the rain drop have a terminal velocity of only 25f/s, compared to the outstretched human, with a tV of ~250f/s?!

Checkmate, aerodynamicists!:cool:

Fat Charlie 06-08-2012 02:51 PM

Density?

How about a thinner human will have a higher percentage of his weight made up of dense things like bone and muscle. Less surface area than water for a given amount of mass. Tubby McLardbutt will have a density more closely approaching that of water and will have a lot more surface area to act as a brake on his form, bringing him closer to the speed of a raindrop?

meanjoe75fan 06-08-2012 03:40 PM

1. Raindrops aren't "teardrop shaped," they're roughly spherical.

2. Raindrops fall slowly due to the "square/cube rule": as you scale up a design (like a raindrop) the force of gravity goes up by the cube, but drag is roughly proportionate to frontal area, and goes up by the square (ignoring Reynold's number.) A teardrop probably falls faster than a teardrop-sized person would.

MetroMPG 06-08-2012 03:42 PM

Partly because rain drops aren't actually teardrop shaped. :P

EDIT: Beat me by 2 minutes, meanjoe75fan!

gone-ot 06-08-2012 03:49 PM

...don't falling raindrops look more like blood platelets, ie: semi squished / flattened in their vertical plane due to air pressure against the center of its originally spherical shape?

...or, maybe, more like a clear Hersey "Kisses" chocolate drop falling with its "flat" bottom facing downward?

mort 06-08-2012 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Christ (Post 311300)
Checkmate, aerodynamicists!

Quote:

Originally Posted by meanjoe75fan
1. Raindrops aren't "teardrop shaped," they're roughly spherical.

2. Raindrops fall slowly due to the "square/cube rule"
But don't ignore Reynolds number.
-m

aerohead 06-08-2012 06:08 PM

teardrop
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Christ (Post 311300)
If a tear drop is such a great aerodynamic shape:

Why does the rain drop have a terminal velocity of only 25f/s, compared to the outstretched human, with a tV of ~250f/s?!

Checkmate, aerodynamicists!:cool:

*Teardrop is not rain drop.
*rain drops alter their form continuously as they fall,as they are a deformable structure,yielding instantaneously to any stressor.
*A raindrops terminal velocity is meaningless unless its mass and time-averaged mean frontal area was specified as well as Reynolds number Same for human.
*The 'teardrop' is used in reference to streamline bodies of revolution of blunt nose and tapering tail.
*Streamline bodies are given the term due to the fact that they are 'streamlined',having no separated flow,and no appreciable turbulent wake.They are the lowest drag form for any structure tested.

Christ 06-08-2012 09:25 PM

I really tried to make it obvious with the "check mate" comment, but you guys are really easy to troll... LOL.

Thanks for making me giggle, though. It's been a long week. :)

ecomodded 06-08-2012 10:32 PM

1 Attachment(s)
:thumbup:

Regenerit 06-09-2012 08:58 AM

I've got a good one: what's the difference between a tear dropped car and a fish shaped car without any fins?
And as a side note: its nice to see efficiency working superbly in nature with the low drag flow throughout the body of a fish with its beautifully tapered body (like the marlin).


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com