06-08-2012, 03:05 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Terminal velocity (THIS IS A TROLL THREAD)
If a tear drop is such a great aerodynamic shape:
Why does the rain drop have a terminal velocity of only 25f/s, compared to the outstretched human, with a tV of ~250f/s?!
Checkmate, aerodynamicists!
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
Last edited by Christ; 06-08-2012 at 10:26 PM..
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-08-2012, 03:51 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Density?
How about a thinner human will have a higher percentage of his weight made up of dense things like bone and muscle. Less surface area than water for a given amount of mass. Tubby McLardbutt will have a density more closely approaching that of water and will have a lot more surface area to act as a brake on his form, bringing him closer to the speed of a raindrop?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
06-08-2012, 04:40 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
eco-scrapper
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Kensington PA
Posts: 69
Thanks: 4
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
1. Raindrops aren't "teardrop shaped," they're roughly spherical.
2. Raindrops fall slowly due to the "square/cube rule": as you scale up a design (like a raindrop) the force of gravity goes up by the cube, but drag is roughly proportionate to frontal area, and goes up by the square (ignoring Reynold's number.) A teardrop probably falls faster than a teardrop-sized person would.
__________________
|
|
|
06-08-2012, 04:42 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Partly because rain drops aren't actually teardrop shaped. :P
EDIT: Beat me by 2 minutes, meanjoe75fan!
|
|
|
06-08-2012, 04:49 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...don't falling raindrops look more like blood platelets, ie: semi squished / flattened in their vertical plane due to air pressure against the center of its originally spherical shape?
...or, maybe, more like a clear Hersey "Kisses" chocolate drop falling with its "flat" bottom facing downward?
|
|
|
06-08-2012, 05:16 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurcher
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 333
Thanks: 148
Thanked 109 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
Checkmate, aerodynamicists!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by meanjoe75fan
1. Raindrops aren't "teardrop shaped," they're roughly spherical.
2. Raindrops fall slowly due to the "square/cube rule"
|
But don't ignore Reynolds number.
-m
|
|
|
06-08-2012, 07:08 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,246
Thanks: 24,379
Thanked 7,358 Times in 4,758 Posts
|
teardrop
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
If a tear drop is such a great aerodynamic shape:
Why does the rain drop have a terminal velocity of only 25f/s, compared to the outstretched human, with a tV of ~250f/s?!
Checkmate, aerodynamicists!
|
*Teardrop is not rain drop.
*rain drops alter their form continuously as they fall,as they are a deformable structure,yielding instantaneously to any stressor.
*A raindrops terminal velocity is meaningless unless its mass and time-averaged mean frontal area was specified as well as Reynolds number Same for human.
*The 'teardrop' is used in reference to streamline bodies of revolution of blunt nose and tapering tail.
*Streamline bodies are given the term due to the fact that they are 'streamlined',having no separated flow,and no appreciable turbulent wake.They are the lowest drag form for any structure tested.
|
|
|
06-08-2012, 10:25 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
I really tried to make it obvious with the "check mate" comment, but you guys are really easy to troll... LOL.
Thanks for making me giggle, though. It's been a long week.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-08-2012, 11:32 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Drive less save more
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,189
Thanks: 134
Thanked 162 Times in 135 Posts
|
__________________
Save gas
Ride a Mtn bike for errands exercise entertainment and outright fun
__________________
|
|
|
06-09-2012, 09:58 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Can I haz Coroplast plz
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Summit, IL
Posts: 83
Thanks: 48
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
I've got a good one: what's the difference between a tear dropped car and a fish shaped car without any fins?
And as a side note: its nice to see efficiency working superbly in nature with the low drag flow throughout the body of a fish with its beautifully tapered body (like the marlin).
__________________
|
|
|
|