Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-04-2013, 04:31 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6 View Post
I do wonder if some (small) gain in reduced pressure drag might be achieve by directing the exhaust flow on a road car though.
i ASSUME some vehicles have this done already.... mostly trucks, where the tailpipe turns out after the rear wheels and they have a small section of the tailpipe "clipped".

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-04-2013, 09:05 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
That puts the exhaust into the most turbulent air available, shortening the time for the fumes to dissipate?


Exit the exhaust into a high-bypass duct like a turbo-jet uses. That will increase the volume 2-3x and cool it with some loss of velocity. One stage, not two. Note the serrated trailing edge on the duct.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 01:29 AM   #13 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6 View Post
The fuel systems and emission controls are inherently more complex and expensive with CI over SI.
I find the absence of emissions controls to be simple and cheap.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 05:16 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: World
Posts: 385
Thanks: 82
Thanked 82 Times in 67 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Exit the exhaust into a high-bypass duct like a turbo-jet uses. That will increase the volume 2-3x and cool it with some loss of velocity. One stage, not two. Note the serrated trailing edge on the duct.
Perhaps some of the "dress tips" that most newer cars have do something similar? If not, why not? If they're there anyway...

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I find the absence of emissions controls to be simple and cheap.
But car manufacturers don't. (And it is Ecomodder.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 01:42 PM   #15 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6 View Post
But car manufacturers don't. (And it is Ecomodder.)
In 1984 they did.

Its eco for economy as in saving money. I only see about 2% of the people on here trying to eco their vehicles to make them run cleaner.

Plus my diesel runs a lot cleaner now than it ever could have in 1984. I happen to like burning all the fuel and getting as much energy out of it as possible before it leaves the engine bay.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2013, 11:48 PM   #16 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
Basically the only reason to retain the throttle-plate is braking power...
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 12:13 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
in that instance, i'd much rather have an electric pump run as needed for vacuum, or in the case of something that would need more than what that could handle, a crank driven unit.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 03:22 AM   #18 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Basically the only reason to retain the throttle-plate is braking power...
I have hydraulicly boosted brakes, no vacuum.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 01:24 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
No Jake brake?

How Jake Brakes Work
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2013, 02:21 PM   #20 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I have hydraulicly boosted brakes, no vacuum.
It wasn't about vacuum. I meant engine-braking power, which is enhanced in the engines with throttle blade. No wonder Diesels are fitted with supplementary engine-braking devices.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com