05-04-2013, 04:31 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324
MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6
I do wonder if some (small) gain in reduced pressure drag might be achieve by directing the exhaust flow on a road car though.
|
i ASSUME some vehicles have this done already.... mostly trucks, where the tailpipe turns out after the rear wheels and they have a small section of the tailpipe "clipped".
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-04-2013, 09:05 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
|
That puts the exhaust into the most turbulent air available, shortening the time for the fumes to dissipate?
Exit the exhaust into a high-bypass duct like a turbo-jet uses. That will increase the volume 2-3x and cool it with some loss of velocity. One stage, not two. Note the serrated trailing edge on the duct.
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 01:29 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6
The fuel systems and emission controls are inherently more complex and expensive with CI over SI.
|
I find the absence of emissions controls to be simple and cheap.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 05:16 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: World
Posts: 385
Thanks: 82
Thanked 82 Times in 67 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Exit the exhaust into a high-bypass duct like a turbo-jet uses. That will increase the volume 2-3x and cool it with some loss of velocity. One stage, not two. Note the serrated trailing edge on the duct.
|
Perhaps some of the "dress tips" that most newer cars have do something similar? If not, why not? If they're there anyway...
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
I find the absence of emissions controls to be simple and cheap.
|
But car manufacturers don't. (And it is Ecomodder.)
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 01:42 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Occasionally6
But car manufacturers don't. (And it is Ecomodder.)
|
In 1984 they did.
Its eco for economy as in saving money. I only see about 2% of the people on here trying to eco their vehicles to make them run cleaner.
Plus my diesel runs a lot cleaner now than it ever could have in 1984. I happen to like burning all the fuel and getting as much energy out of it as possible before it leaves the engine bay.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
05-05-2013, 11:48 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
Basically the only reason to retain the throttle-plate is braking power...
|
|
|
05-06-2013, 12:13 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324
MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
|
in that instance, i'd much rather have an electric pump run as needed for vacuum, or in the case of something that would need more than what that could handle, a crank driven unit.
__________________
|
|
|
05-06-2013, 03:22 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
Basically the only reason to retain the throttle-plate is braking power...
|
I have hydraulicly boosted brakes, no vacuum.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
05-06-2013, 01:24 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
|
|
|
|
05-06-2013, 02:21 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,882
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,684 Times in 1,502 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
I have hydraulicly boosted brakes, no vacuum.
|
It wasn't about vacuum. I meant engine-braking power, which is enhanced in the engines with throttle blade. No wonder Diesels are fitted with supplementary engine-braking devices.
|
|
|
|