Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-28-2014, 01:22 PM   #11 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
How wide does the air dam go? So long as it reaches out to at least as wide as the inner edges of the front tires, I think it would be good.
Is the bumper cover open on the bottom side, or can you see the radiator/condenser from just infront of the airdam? I'm wondering if you may have inadvertently made an airdam that is great for cooling purposes, creating higher pressure infront of the radiator / air dam, while causing lower pressure behind the radiator / air dam, causing more air to go through the radiator, not around the car. I would close / cover up the bottom side of the bumper cover (assuming it's open) to help make sure the air your blocking is going around, not through. That by itself could potentially reduce air flow through the cooling system to less than stock( I kinda doubt it though) but monitor how each step affects your coolant temps. If the air dam is creating a lower pressure behind the radiator, it would help draw more air through the radiator, so you could exploit that by blocking part of the grill opening

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 2000mc For This Useful Post:
FordFiestaS (09-28-2014)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-29-2014, 02:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
The brake pedal is evil
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 401

Denny's Detector - '08 Mercury Grand Marquis

Taserface - '17 Chevy Volt
Thanks: 5
Thanked 57 Times in 52 Posts
I remember the crisis fighter pinto needed a partial grill block with the air dam because otherwise it would just go through the engine bay.
__________________
Getting sensor data off of a pre OBDII Toyota ECU via TDCL.
All of this is on E10: Project E is my current focus.

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 12:59 PM   #13 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern Vermont
Posts: 57

Oliver - '13 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 46.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
So I'm off to do the final A of the air dam ABA on the Fiesta

Slightly cooler air today then the original A, B, B (yep 2 B's) tests runs thus far..... but time now permits me to do it.

So off I go. Report to follow.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 01:50 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: MI
Posts: 54

grey panther - '02 Mercury Grand Marquis
Team Panther
90 day: 27.15 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Ditto on adding some grill block to make the air dam effective. Also you can extend the corners a bit lower, like another inch, Dynamat folded to attach on the front and back side works good and will stiffen it and keep it quiet. It deforms easy with any impact without causing damage to anything else or your main air dam. You can't really move the air from the middle of the car to the sides. The crown of the road is high in the center and limits how low you can go there.. Happy to have the air to the Radiator come from air that would have gone under the car anyhow and block the top of the grill to have that air easily go over the top of the hood
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 01:58 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: MI
Posts: 54

grey panther - '02 Mercury Grand Marquis
Team Panther
90 day: 27.15 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by FordFiestaS View Post
Photos of ScanGauge II readings here :

Test run #2 (B) of ABA results. | My802.com

Summary of Guage readings :

A gain of only .5 MPG. Assuming there is actually a gain and not some other variable rearing it's head.

Trip time : = @ 1.1 hrs

Distance : = @ 55.3 miles

Max speed run (B) gained 3 mph (essentially equal)

Average speed : = @ 49 mph

MPG (A) @ 50.5 MPG - (B) @ 51 MPG

So all in all not a biggie. One more run to go tomorrow.
Your test speed was 49 MPH which was nice for MPG, but I think a test at 60 and 70 MPH would show a much bigger improvement or difference, My guess is 1.5 MPG with a modest upper grill block on the top side, like 6" of blu tape for a test
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 02:55 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern Vermont
Posts: 57

Oliver - '13 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 46.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
Final results for the air dam install on Fiesta S

Sadly some construction altered my route. About 2 miles short w/some end results varied slightly but....

Nonetheless an OK run.

Photos of results posted here :

Final run of ABA front spoiler Fiesta S | My802.com

Slightly "better" MPG 's w/o air dam even though temps were about 15° cooler.

I need to work more on this as not all is lost.

I read the previous posts and agree with all points given.

I live in Vermont and our state speed limit is 50mph with a few exceptions. I used a route that was 55mph RT 7 from Bennington to Manchester VT. Great ride BTW this time of year with the leaves.

I will modify the grill block I used to have and make a better air dam.

For now any input is greatly appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2014, 03:25 PM   #17 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
i dont think i'd read into it too much with a different route. different days already throws in more of a variable than you would want, although id expect the opposite affect from the temperture. testing at 65mph months apart on different routes, but with a car that should be delivering virtually the same results, ive had results of 37.5 one day and 43.5mpg another. the roads were asphalt vs concrete, virtually flat vs shallow rolling hills, different temperatures, wind.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2014, 07:00 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
input

Quote:
Originally Posted by FordFiestaS View Post
Sadly some construction altered my route. About 2 miles short w/some end results varied slightly but....

Nonetheless an OK run.

Photos of results posted here :

Final run of ABA front spoiler Fiesta S | My802.com

Slightly "better" MPG 's w/o air dam even though temps were about 15° cooler.

I need to work more on this as not all is lost.

I read the previous posts and agree with all points given.

I live in Vermont and our state speed limit is 50mph with a few exceptions. I used a route that was 55mph RT 7 from Bennington to Manchester VT. Great ride BTW this time of year with the leaves.

I will modify the grill block I used to have and make a better air dam.

For now any input is greatly appreciated.
Your average speed is going to have to be as close to 55-mph as possible in order to pull out any meaningful results.And you need to be fully warmed up:engine/transaxle/differential before you ever begin.A 15-degree temp difference can hit you hard by itself.
The shape of the car can be the only variable on the test.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (10-03-2014)
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
aerodynamics, air dam, fiesta, mod





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com