Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-13-2012, 01:42 AM   #11 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,705

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,278
Thanked 731 Times in 464 Posts
+1

If you had to replace the engine, then you could go with a smaller one and turbo it, but just slapping a turbo on won't help fuel economy much, if at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
I'd rather get an intercooler.
An intercooler helps only on turbodiesels. On normal diesels it doesn't do anything (other than restrict the intake), nor on gassers as in this case.

jm283611, swap the tranny and replace your tires with slightly taller ones when the time comes, this will reduce rpms at highway speeds. Also, add a warm air intake, ie so your engine is getting intake air from the warm engine bay, not the cooler outside. Warm air is less dense than cold, so less air gets into the cylinder, and with it less fuel.

Since you mostly do highway driving, then you would greatly benefit from aeromods - smooth wheel covers, partial grille block, smooth bellypan, rear wheel skirts. A Kammback or even boattail would do wonders to you FE

__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-13-2012, 06:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
Turbochargers do increase efficiency, but only at less than 2 lbs boost. More than that and the ecu crams more fuel in

Think pumping loses
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 10:41 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 829
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Turbos help diesels get better mileage. They can increase efficiency of a gasser, but, that means they will make more power at wide open throttle. This doesn't help you any at improving mileage at 60 mph. It all keeps coming back to that PITA throttle (which a diesel doesn't have). What good is it to boost the I/P pressure if the throttle will just close a bit? It's the same thing for CAI.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 12:09 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
The reason "they" say turbos can increase fuel economy is for those situations when a much smaller displacement turbocharged engine is fitted instead of a bigger naturally aspirated lump. Sticking a turbo onto whatever is already in there will not result in fuel savings.
and here is the problem with this whole idea....

the turbine housing is actually a significant restriction in the exhaust and causes a considerable jump in backpressure. now you have to overcome that resistance as well, and resistance is about the last thing you want when looking for efficiency increases.

if you're going to gain fuel economy(with a gas engine) with a turbocharger, it's not going to happen compared to an otherwise identical engine without the hairdryer. a lower displacement or otherwise significantly better thermal efficiency is required to see a boost in MPG.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 12:28 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master Ecomadman
 
arcosine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 1,151

sc1 - '98 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 43.17 mpg (US)

Airplane Bike - '11 home built Carp line Tour

rans - '97 rans tailwind

tractor - '66 International Cub cadet 129

2002 Space Odyssey - '02 Honda Odyssey EX-L
90 day: 28.25 mpg (US)

red bug - '00 VW beetle TDI

big tractor - '66 ford 3400

red vw - '00 VW new beetle TDI
90 day: 58.42 mpg (US)

RV - '88 Winnebago LeSharo
90 day: 16.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 334 Times in 226 Posts
I'd doubt you would be running boost on the highway, And I doubt you would see any mph gain. Try a hot air intake first.
__________________
- Tony

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 12:30 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Jakins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 252

hX-TREME!!! - '97 Honda Civic HX
90 day: 54.75 mpg (US)

450sX-TREME!!! - '95 Nissan V8 240sx

chodercycle - '06 kawasaki ninja zx6r 636
Thanks: 18
Thanked 43 Times in 23 Posts
ok, so i had a turbo on my civic back when i though racing hondas was cool. before that i got around 40 mpg, with the turbo im not totally sure what it was, but it was like 32-35? MAYBE i cant remember, bottom line is, it was less. and this was set up as good as it could get for mpg (cuz im cheep) at first i had bigger 310 injectors and the entire time i was not running a secondary o2 sensor, as well as im pretty sure the boost blew my pcv valve out and i had no idea about it and i had onle a 4 inch down pipe and no exhaust. but then i put some stock integra injectors in. it was better. i had no tune and a small intercooler. about 5-7 psi of boost. MAYBE if you ran super tiny boost and got a real nice tune you could see an increase. but running stock injectors with boost is what killed my old engine. the only thing that is for sure about turbos is it will make your car faster. i was able to beat v8 mustangs lol. you might be able to get the same MPG as before but it will take tuning. its a very expensive way to get a gain in mpg though. dont take my word for it though, im not exactly the smartest person in the world. i just have a tiny bit of experience in that field.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 03:22 PM   #17 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,187

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
The reason "they" say turbos can increase fuel economy is for those situations when a much smaller displacement turbocharged engine is fitted instead of a bigger naturally aspirated lump. Sticking a turbo onto whatever is already in there will not result in fuel savings.
Or "they" are talking about diesel engines.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 08:26 PM   #18 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,628 Times in 1,453 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
An intercooler helps only on turbodiesels. On normal diesels it doesn't do anything (other than restrict the intake), nor on gassers as in this case.
When I said I'd rather get an intercooler, I should've said I wouldn't get rid of it, alongside the turbo. Since it would lead to a colder intake temperature, would reduce the risk of pistons overheat while running leaner
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 09:20 PM   #19 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Or "they" are talking about diesel engines.
Could be any ICE I suppose, but see "Ford Ecoboost" and the like.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2012, 09:32 PM   #20 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,628 Times in 1,453 Posts
Remember, it's not just 'bout consumption, a turbo can also help to get less emissions. In some Brazilian cities there are already environmental inspections, and often turbocharged engines have better results than its naturally-aspirated counterparts since the combustion process is more complete, leading to lesser HC and carbon monoxide emissions.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com