Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hybrids
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-16-2013, 12:21 AM   #11 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
How much gain do you expect from <2HP assist?

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-16-2013, 01:24 AM   #12 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Well, in a small car, that's half the power it takes to maintain 40MPH right?
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 01:41 AM   #13 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Thus putting the ICE into an even more inefficient state of unloadedness?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 01:53 AM   #14 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Well, yeah. Duh. LOL
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 02:13 AM   #15 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
OK, it's no good for cruising... how much does it help during acceleration?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 05:03 PM   #16 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
so at what, 50 hp for a 3 cyl metro add 2 (optimistically) and you now have 52 hp to accelerate with.

stock:
1376 lbs and 50 hp= 27.52 lbs/hp
a 0-60 of 13 seconds

with 2! extra hp:
it's 1376 and 52hp= 26.46 lbs/hp
a guess of 12.5sec 0-60 at a very optimistic gain.(13/27.52=.472=12.49) This is a very very best case situation, as a car heavier than a metro, or more powerful than a metro (IE just about any other car on the road) will have less performance change due to higher weight and higher horsepower premod, also 2hp is extremely generous. If using a lower gas power setting for acceleration 2 extra hp would help a little more. How long would the belt/belts last getting subject to near their maximum holding power (both for the discharge and recharge)

To recharge after the acceleration the alt would be drawing more power (putting more load on the engine and reducing cruise MPG till the battery is topped off)? If so the maths that I would do before even investigating how to go about doing it is to figure out if the fuel saved during acceleration is more than the increased fuel used during cruise.

If regen braking is to be wired in will decelerating with engine braking and the alternator recharging near it's max be capable of getting back the energy spent or would it still be better to just coast down?

Most hybrid systems that have been successful deliver over 10% of the max available power, they are also capable of regenerating that power quickly. The insight for example with a 67 hp engine has a 13hp electric motor(nearly 20%)
__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bestclimb For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (05-16-2013)
Old 05-16-2013, 11:05 PM   #17 (permalink)
halos.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
2hp? Better than zero, I guess. Truth be known, I'd really like something like this: Integrated Starter Generator | Denso Global Products
Frank, I still can't help but laugh at the cat...
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 11:16 PM   #18 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
How is <2HP better than 0?

I love that kitty too!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2013, 09:33 PM   #19 (permalink)
halos.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
I figure if you only use it going uphill, another 2 hp is better to have helping... Although on a mountain climb, the battery may not be up to the task...
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2013, 09:44 PM   #20 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
It would be about like adding pedals. Or like throwing a glass of water into the ocean.

For example: http://www.060calculator.com/

100 HP, 2600 lbs., m/t, fwd = 10.417 seconds 0-60
+2 HP-----------------------10.263, .15 of a second faster.

__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 05-20-2013 at 09:51 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com