01-30-2013, 08:47 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Salt Lake valley Utah
Posts: 923
Thanks: 114
Thanked 397 Times in 224 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
The stock original Insight has a Cd of 0.25 and the frontal area is 20.0 sq ft, so the CdA is 5.0 sq ft.
If you do a full aero drag treatment (bellypan, boattail, mirror delete, front wheel skirts, smooth flat wheels, grill block) and drop the Cd to 0.17, then the CdA would be 3.4 sq ft - which is a 32% improvement!
To do the same thing by deleting the roof etc., you would have to reduce the 20 sq ft frontal area down to 13.6 sq ft - which is very hard to do. The HUGE assumption is that the Cd would remain 0.25 - and I don't think it would. Doing this would completely rejigger the air flow.
What good is a car that doesn't have a roof?
|
I meant to say then redesign the roof, glass and bodywork around the minimal frontal area.
As you said, "drop the Cd to 0.17, then the CdA would be 3.4 sq ft - which is a 32% improvement." There's no way to reasonably improve beyond a 0.17cd on a conventional car. But, if you half the frontal area (if that is at all physically possible) by removing all interior space (econoboxing the heck out of it) and retain the 0.17cd streamlining your CdA is now 1.7 sq ft which is a (64%) improvement???
It makes you see the potential of motorcycles!
__________________
I try to be helpful. I'm not an expert.
Last edited by sheepdog 44; 01-30-2013 at 09:06 PM..
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-30-2013, 09:03 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,541
Thanks: 8,085
Thanked 8,878 Times in 7,327 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog 44
Also 200mpg on gas is unrealistic and comes at too high a sacrifice, unless you alter the (very poor) hybrid component of the vehicle.
|
There, someone said it. If you do get to your goal you won't have an Insight anymore
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
What good is a car that doesn't have a roof?
|
Nothing's off the table, right? How about ∞mpg, but you can only do it once a week?
|
|
|
01-30-2013, 09:50 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,749
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
|
I'm surprised to see so many responses to this ridiculous thread. Nobody is going to get 200mpg from a modified Insight. Furthermore, the OP has only 1 post and isn't interacting with anyone on the forum.
If you want to go 200mpg on petrol, you had better start from scratch, or the top of a very tall mountain.
|
|
|
01-30-2013, 09:50 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
The original Insight has an important thing most cars do not: the rear wheel track is narrower than the front. The AeroCivic has a Cd of about 0.17 and I'll bet that 3-Wheeler's Insight with full bellypan and boattail is darn close to that - it only lacks rear wheel strakes and front wheel skirts.
Both the Illuminati Motor Works 'Seven' and Dave Cloud's Dolphin get over 200MPGe in cars. As has been said, an electric drivetrain will be the only reasonable way to do this.
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 02:53 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,541
Thanks: 8,085
Thanked 8,878 Times in 7,327 Posts
|
Quote:
I'm surprised to see so many responses to this ridiculous thread. Nobody is going to get 200mpg from a modified Insight. Furthermore, the OP has only 1 post and isn't interacting with anyone on the forum.
|
I was only getting started. The fringes is where you find the weird stuff.
Quote:
As has been said, an electric drivetrain will be the only reasonable way to do this.
|
'It's been said...' I'm going to go all contrarian:
VW Handling & Suspension Tuning
Narrowing Factory IRS Control Arms | Airkewld
https://www.google.com/search?q=narrow+VW+rear+axles
Last edited by freebeard; 01-31-2013 at 03:20 AM..
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 04:10 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
|
Oh God... no... not the 100+++ mpg carbs!
You'd think that at least one of those would have showed up at a proper testing venue like X-Prize or the Shell EcoMarathons by now...
-
200 mpg. Is that with pedal assist or all motor?
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 05:05 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,541
Thanks: 8,085
Thanked 8,878 Times in 7,327 Posts
|
That's only the tip of the iceberg:
Tesla’s Electric Car
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 05:12 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carson City, Nevada
Posts: 612
Thanks: 240
Thanked 114 Times in 90 Posts
|
Damn that J. P. Morgan!!! Damn him!!!
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 07:18 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
200 mpg
My opinion is that you should do a body in white,clean sheet build,based on VW's 1st-gen 1-liter car and skip the Insight altogether.
Since VW was getting 237 mpg,it wouldn't be a bad starting/ending point.
Just rob a bank 'cause you won't be leaving your shop for a few thousand hours.Minimum!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
01-31-2013, 09:59 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
|
The Insight body is a really good starting point, I'd think. While it's entirely possible to build a 200 mpg car... high school kids do it every year for the Shell Eco-Marathons... well... 10,000 mpg... you probably can't do it at 55 mph.
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
|
Oh Lord... the part in the comments where they start talking about death rays!
|
|
|
|