Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-18-2016, 09:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Variable displacement via Arduino

All, I have been doing some experimentation with variable displacement as described below. So far it's worked from a technical point of view but can't validate fuel economy with mpguino as this mod cuts inj pulses. One unexpected gain has been an improvement in throttle response/ pickup because there is less vacuum.

In essence the arduio watches a pulsed ground injector, counts and selectively interrupts the injection by driving open a solid state relay. I am experiememting on a 1.8l. 4cyl engine and the engine still runs smoothly with every 2nd pulse interrupted for all cylinders which is essentially 50% cylinder deactivation. My initial objective is to raise the manifold pressure from about 70kPaa to say 90kPaa, rather than convert to throttles altogether. My understanding is that approx a 10-15% FE improvement is expected without touching the valves as occurred in traditional deactivation.

One challenge is how to achieve closed loop control when inactive cycles pump air into the exhaust.

I'd be curious to know if anyone else has done any research or experimentation with cycle based cylinder deactivation.

I understand the GM/ Delphi commercialising the technology this year.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to amnonholland For This Useful Post:
Daox (11-19-2016)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-19-2016, 01:35 AM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
There has been quite a bit of tinkering with injector interrupts and it's a fail. 10-15% is what one can hope for with valve deactivation.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2016, 09:46 AM   #3 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
Interesting idea. 10-15% does seem like a lot since you are still pumping air. However, it would be great to see what you can do just with some electronics.

If you reprogrammed the arduino to sense cylinder deactivation, you could just cut your fuel use calculated by 50% when the cylinders are deactivated.

To monitor air fuel ratios when in cylinder deactivation mode, you'll probably need a wideband oxygen sensor. A narrow band sensor simply won't be able to monitor air fuel ratios outside its designed range.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2016, 02:01 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Frank can you point me to any forum threads or reference materials where people have tried this. I haven't been able to find anything. Thanks

Daox, my understanding is that the majority of the pumping loss is at the throttle, since that has a 30-40kPa pressure drop at partload.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2016, 07:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
How would this differ from lean burn?
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2016, 08:07 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
LittleBlackDuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Land Downunder
Posts: 229

CT - '11 Lexus CT200h Luxury
Thanks: 26
Thanked 80 Times in 61 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
How would this differ from lean burn?
Alternate burn - still a stoich mixture in the hole but not every stroke. The main issue is the slow-ish response of the lambda sensor that will screw up the ST and LT fuel trims by enriching them to the point that it will probably use more fuel. This type of mod needs to be coded into the ECU so that the downstream effects can be allowed for or ignored as required.

Simon

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com