Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-15-2011, 08:35 PM   #11 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
it is just that the chances of a positive effect seem far less than the chances of a negative effect, as I see it anyway.

__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-15-2011, 09:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
the only way to find out is experimentation, i don't see there being much of an impact on FE, but i've heard from friends that they have noticed differences in driveability/stability at highway speeds, especially with crosswinds and passing semi-trucks (hitting the wind deflected off of the front).
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2011, 09:40 PM   #13 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
For the sake of argument let's just say they work. The factory boys with supercomputers and windtunnels and teams of experts and a big budget were able to lower Cd by .006... and that's on specific, limited applications. Would they not utilize their hard-earned knowledge and put VG on all their models if it was worth it?

.006.

Doesn't that right there tell you how much this is worth obsessing over?
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 03-15-2011 at 09:50 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2011, 11:59 PM   #14 (permalink)
MP$
 
diesel_john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 595
Thanks: 5
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
Send a message via MSN to diesel_john
Smile

Why don't the super computer boys make their cars narrower and longer.
That might lower the drag.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 12:21 AM   #15 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Because today's stylish motorist wants to be seen in an oversized cube.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 12:29 AM   #16 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
and why don't they use air dams from the factory? because the general public doesn't want that on their cars, maybe they did a survey that showed people didn't like the idea of VG's on their cars
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 12:48 AM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 82
Thanks: 3
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by diesel_john View Post
Why don't the super computer boys make their cars narrower and longer.
That might lower the drag.
Some do, such as the Prius. Look at its cross section compared to many cars. The windshield and hood line have obviously been tweaked to improve airflow.

Part of the reason many cars look like a brick is the efficiency of outside volume to inside volume that such a design brings to the table. (This is not true of all of them though. Just look at some of the "crossover" SUVs that are big on the outside and small on the inside.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 01:30 AM   #18 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 75 Times in 58 Posts
if the super computer boys did all the stuff to make the cars as economical as absolutely possible than this site would only have one category, Driving Technique
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 02:35 AM   #19 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Say you do twice as good- .012. Still peanuts.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 03:31 AM   #20 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
I can't believe these resurfaced. They're gimmicks in 99% of the applications. My 04 Honda Civic is in fact and absolutely ideal candidate for these things, the back window is just a little too steep to maintain attached flow. But flying pigs would have to be waging the snowball war of the century in hell before I'd ever put VG's on my car.

However, I am considering this......





But I don't know if my brakes are strong enough to slow the car once this thing takes over. The only reason I'll have to keep the engine running is the power steering & brakes. (and AC on hot days)

I'm going to have to be careful of the shear power of this because, and I quote from the designer builder:

"Conversely the new DIT2-wing technology makes use of the compression ratio similar to the piston in your engine equaling a 10/1 compression ratio because the piston is housed in a sleeve. Likewise the DIT2 turbine is housed in a sleeve, which is designed to take full advantage of super low-pressure vortex action, which in turn generates an implosive thrust in opposition to explosive thrust. The thing to remember is that there is more energy in this pulling force than there is in brute pushing force."

The implosive thrust in opposition to the explosive thrust is what sold me! (I hope this does not violate the "Family Friendly" terms I agreed to in order to post in this forum)

When I get about 80 miles NNE of Vegas, this thing just really starts to work amazingly.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com