'wake vs Cd'
I'm two states from home on a family medical emergency, on a computer I can hardly navigate.
* Go to GOOGLE
* search for ' windsor body cfd model'
* scroll down to find ' MDPI, The Aerodynamic Effects of a 3D Streamlined Tail on the Windsor Body,' by PhD Jeff Howell et al., at Loughborough University.
__________________________________________________ _____________
They've cfd'd and wind tunnel tested 2D and 3D tails.
* As with earlier presentations, the drag coefficient changes exactly as a function of the size of the wake.
* And the 3d tail is 57% more efficient at streamlining than the 2D tail.
__________________________________________________ _____________
Since Jeff shows his references, we know that he's aware of the most complicated , compound- curvature tails of Jaray, Fachsenfeld, Kamm, and Mair,etc.,and when tumblehome and edge radii are introduced, there will be an additional 16.6% drag reduction for the 'ideal' shape.
__________________________________________________ _____________
The guy who did the tail fabrication for research ( PhD Max Varney.
, has moved on to Mercedes-Benz' Formula One
__________________________________________________ _____________
If they find someone to fabricate the compound-surface tail as with the 1922 and beyond reporting, we'll have drag curves for the 'template' elongations from both CFD and wind tunnel. As in the past, there's nothing which can exceed it's efficiency for drag reduction, if the vehicle's forebody and underside has already been optimized.
All future low-drag automobiles will have it.
a
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|