Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-10-2012, 03:31 PM   #11 (permalink)
oldschool
 
Olympiadis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 184

White2003Focus - '03 Ford Focus SE 4-door sedan
Team Ford
90 day: 38.53 mpg (US)

White2001S10pickup - '01 Chevy S10 extended cab LR
Last 3: 24.51 mpg (US)

1989DodgeOMNI - '89 Dodge Omni
Last 3: 30.38 mpg (US)

1991ChevyC1500pickup - '91 Chevy C1500
Last 3: 24.03 mpg (US)

White1986Irocz - '86 Chevy Irocz LB9
Last 3: 30.14 mpg (US)

1999 C5 Corvette - '99 Chevy Corvette

2008 Infinity G37 - '08 Infinity G37
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 25 Posts
Right. If you don't have a return-style fuel pressure regulator then you're in luck because extra tank vapor isn't an issue.

I was talking about return-style systems, which is what I'm almost always working with. It's not always a bad thing, and if you route the extra vapor back to the intake the adaptive fueling will cut back a small amount on the injector pulse-width. Ideally all of the tank vapor gets routed back to the intake and burns. The main problem with the warm fuel (if it's too warm) in the tank is pressure build-up after engine shut-down.
A similar circumstance is created whenever a heat-shield between the exhaust and the fuel tank falls off. I have seen it expand the fuel (and vapor) to the point that fuel would leak out of the fill-tube and high-pressure vent.
Warm fuel does expand and will therefor throw off your fill measurements and mpg calculation if you're filling at inconsistent fuel temps.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com