05-26-2021, 09:19 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
High Altitude Hybrid
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 2,079
Thanks: 1,129
Thanked 584 Times in 463 Posts
|
What ever happened to HHV technology?
Back in 2008, the United Parcel Service (UPS) decided to deploy a few hydraulic hybrids for their delivery fleet.
A few cities also bought several HHV garbage trucks. Then there started to be a small trickle of news claiming that hydraulic hybrids could have a future in everything from very large commercial vehicles to passenger vehicles to bicycles.
A few companies even started offering HHV conversions for existing vehicles. But a quick search on google seems to indicate that they've all stopped offering such services. The idea seems to have fizzled with no new news on further developments.
But what happened to HHV technology?
The technology looked very promising, and still does to an extent.
With regenerative braking efficiencies claims of up to 80% and potentially double the fuel savings, hydraulic hybrid technology had been lauded as being even more efficient than electric hybrid technology and potentially cheaper. The concept was proven to work even in very large commercial vehicles.
But none of that has seemed to help HHV news from disappearing. What happened to the HHV?
Was it that it was too expensive to make? I noticed that Orlando's HHV garbage trucks cost them over $150,000 more a piece, or about 165% what a non-hybrid truck would have cost.
Was it that other technologies eclipsed the interest in them? If you look at Orlando's latest purchases in trash trucks they've now switched to apparently non-hybrid CNG trucks.
EV's also may have caused a loss of interest in HHV's kind of the same way EV's have caused some to lose interest in plug-in hybrids.
Is there some other reason? Did they not get the efficiency that they were expected to get? Did they have reliability problems? Or is this a highly efficient fuel saving technology with untapped potential that everyone has aparently forgotten about?
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-26-2021, 09:32 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
High Altitude Hybrid
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 2,079
Thanks: 1,129
Thanked 584 Times in 463 Posts
|
I guess I may have at least partially answered my own question. Lightning hybrids was one of the companies that was developing and selling hydraulic hybrid conversions. They are now focused on EV's.
https://companyweek.com/article/lightning-systems
Quote:
The company pivoted with "the writing on the wall" for the gas-electric hybrid vehicle market, says Reeser, and began focusing exclusively on all-electric drivetrains in late 2017. In the process, it rebranded from Lightning Hybrids to Lightning Systems.
"Batteries got better," notes Reeser. "A lot of that was driven by the automotive space. . . . moving batteries into higher production, so the price was coming down, the power and energy was going up. Broadly, cities were saying, 'We don't want hybrids. We really want zero emissions for noise reductions and improvements in air quality.'"
|
__________________
|
|
|
05-26-2021, 10:00 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
|
I would venture to guess the development/production/manufacturing costs simply don't provide enough of a benefit over electric hybrid or EV.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ksa8907 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-26-2021, 11:23 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
|
It's always been about the best way to store energy. They are all fighting a tough fight as gasoline stores so much energy per kilogram and "recharges" in seconds.
When these were being developed did they have Li-ion batteries yet? There were also flywheel busses in development as well. They would respin the flywheel every so many stops.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-26-2021, 11:25 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
Batteries became cheap.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-26-2021, 03:45 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
High Altitude Hybrid
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 2,079
Thanks: 1,129
Thanked 584 Times in 463 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ksa8907
I would venture to guess the development/production/manufacturing costs simply don't provide enough of a benefit over electric hybrid or EV.
|
Very probable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird
It's always been about the best way to store energy. They are all fighting a tough fight as gasoline stores so much energy per kilogram and "recharges" in seconds.
When these were being developed did they have Li-ion batteries yet? There were also flywheel busses in development as well. They would respin the flywheel every so many stops.
|
The hydraulic hybrid was never intended to be a means to store massive amounts of energy but to work exclusively as a traditional hybrid that helps save fuel through regenerative braking. It only makes (made) sense on stop and go vehicles. Vehicles that cruise down a highway wouldn't benefit much from the regenerative braking.
At the time there weren't any Li-ion hybrids or EV's. The only thing that came close were the NiMH hybrids, namely the 1st Gen Honda Insight and the 1st and 2nd gen Toyota Prius. The NiMH hybrids were said to get up to 20% or 25% regen efficiency and weighed more per unit of power.
By comparison, the hydraulic hybrid systems that had been developed and tested at that time were 70% to 80% efficient at regenerative braking and were light enough to be easily adapted to commercial vehicles that normally need all the weight savings they can get in order to haul their cargo. For an example, on a full sized bus the hydraulic hybrid system might mean you would lose one passenger in capacity. (This is why many have serious doubts about a Tesla or other company produced battery electric semi truck. The added weight of the batteries displaces the weight of the cargo that can be carried.)
Anywho, for hybrids at least maybe the lithium ion battery caught up to and surpassed the hydraulic accumulator in power to weight ratio or effiency (I've seen claims of Tesla regen being 85% or even 95% efficent although I have serioius doubts.) Even if li-ion batteries don't surpass it in those aspects, they definitely do in terms of energy density, making li-ion batteries better for certain applications.
For an example, anything plug-in (hybrid or pure EV) would benefit from a li-ion battery. Also when traveling over mountains a lithium EV or hybrid system would help soak up energy while regening down the pass. These are things that cannot be done in a hydraulic hybrid.
I think what attracts me to the hydraulic hybrid idea is that it isn't affected as much by cold weather. My NiMH hybrids suffer quite a bit during the winter, and I'm sure a lot has to do with battery temperature since I can warm up the engine and catalytic converter, keeping the heater off, and still drive around without the engine ever wanting to shut off. And in our Nissan Leaf the cold still took a huge toll on range even when trying to hypermile without turning on the heater.
__________________
|
|
|
05-26-2021, 07:25 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,913
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,694 Times in 1,512 Posts
|
Hydraulic hybrid setups are quite mechanically complex compared to Toyota's HSD and other similar hybrid electrics, or even some serial hybrid electrics such as the Wrightspeed Route system.
|
|
|
05-26-2021, 08:52 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,267
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
What happened?
Batteries.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
05-27-2021, 12:44 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
High Altitude Hybrid
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 2,079
Thanks: 1,129
Thanked 584 Times in 463 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
What happened?
Batteries.
|
Does that mean there are a lot of electric hybrid or full BEV delivery trucks, trash trucks, metro buses and school buses now?
Or why did places like Orlando change their hybrid trash trucks in for CNG non-hybrid trucks?
__________________
|
|
|
05-27-2021, 01:09 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,267
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
It appears to be the solution no one wanted.
It hydraulic hybrids seem to work great and nothing is wrong with the technology.
But the prices of hydraulic gear appears to be increasing while batteries and inverter tech keeps getting cheaper.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|