11-20-2019, 12:03 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,404
Thanks: 24,471
Thanked 7,410 Times in 4,800 Posts
|
wall
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor95
https://jalopnik.com/what-kind-of-fu...1839901794/amp
Despite some inaccuracies and bad comparisons I noticed in the article, it explains well that engine efficiency plays just an important part in fuel economy as coefficient of drag does. So some cars that are shaped like bricks (my Jeep) can still get good FE without making too many concessions to aerodynamics. Not something too many ecomodders consider as most cars here have small engines and have a fairly low cd already.
|
I've never heard of a comparison with a wall,only a brick,which would be Cd 0.85.
Members mentioned a flat plate,that would be Cd 1.11.
All ICE engines, whether gas or diesel will have an engine map,on which there will exist an island of lowest BSFC.Engineers might shoot for gearing which would hold the engine load,at cruise velocity,near the optimum BSFC on level road.
The CVT(Van Dorne) transmission is designed to maximize BSFC,keeping the engine in its 'sweet-spot' under all transient conditions.One reason why hybrids with the Atkinson-cycle engine do so well.Their gutless as far as torque goes,but they've got the motor to compensate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since,on the open road,at constant speed,aerodynamic drag is 80-90% of load,it remains the greatest impediment to efficiency.And why all Tesla cars,Prius,Insight,and Hyundai Ioniq,etc.,can clean the best ICE car's clock in efficiency (119-130 mpge).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
A early 1970s JEEP CJ would get 33.5% better fuel economy with the body of a Prius ( all other factors held constant). With air-suspension it could probably 'go' where a CJ goes.I've no idea what a person could get with a GDI-turbo ICE engine or TDI diesel in a standard JEEP body.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-20-2019, 12:14 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,404
Thanks: 24,471
Thanked 7,410 Times in 4,800 Posts
|
29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor95
The author of the article calculated that a brick wall with a Prius engine would still get 29 mpg at 50 mph.
|
I came up with,around 22.5 mpg at 62-mph.It would be a little better at 50.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
11-20-2019, 12:21 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,992
Thanks: 8,226
Thanked 9,000 Times in 7,434 Posts
|
![](https://ecomodder.com/forum/member-freebeard-albums-photoshops-picture4820-screen-shot-2013-03-27-12-29-57.png)
My favorite what-if would be a Prius with a Dasher 5-speed, 36hp VW and Porsche cooling fan. The donor vehicle got 40mpg with a 0.41 Cd. The Prius would loose hundreds of pounds of weight. I estimate equal economy and less acceleration.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-20-2019, 02:00 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,404
Thanks: 24,471
Thanked 7,410 Times in 4,800 Posts
|
air-cooled,5-speed,Prius-Dasher
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
![](https://ecomodder.com/forum/member-freebeard-albums-photoshops-picture4820-screen-shot-2013-03-27-12-29-57.png)
My favorite what-if would be a Prius with a Dasher 5-speed, 36hp VW and Porsche cooling fan. The donor vehicle got 40mpg with a 0.41 Cd. The Prius would loose hundreds of pounds of weight. I estimate equal economy and less acceleration.
|
A Dasher with a Prius body,and tires,if the same frontal area and weight would be 47.8-mph HWY.The air-cooled engine though,would knock the BSFC into the dirt.Without liquid-cooling,there's no way to operate it at temperatures high enough to achieve the thermal efficiency of the Dasher engine.You could lose 15%,ending up at around 41.5 mpg,not a great incentive for all the work.
Also,at 36-bhp,you'd have to get a run at every hill,entering the grade at top speed,just to have a chance to crest at any speed at all and not impeding other traffic.It's the only way I could operate my '64 Ghia,with the 40-horse,1,200 cc.Even rowing down through the extra gear,she'd still find it hard to climb. ![Stick Out Tongue](/forum/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-20-2019, 04:29 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,992
Thanks: 8,226
Thanked 9,000 Times in 7,434 Posts
|
The Dasher gets 45mpg with [approx. 0.32 Cd?] so not much gain there. You're prolly right about the BSFC.
My panel van had a 1600 with dual Solexes and weighed (empty) about as much as a Beetle (worse Cd). It topped out at 80 on I-5 and topped the Coast Range at 75.
The Type II is sort of a pebble-ized brick end-on, so it's back to ontopic.
Quote:
Without liquid-cooling,there's no way to operate it at temperatures high enough to achieve the thermal efficiency of the Dasher engine.
|
I baked a few air-cooled engines trying. ![Smile](/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-23-2019, 12:23 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
Put the wall on its side ![Big Grin](/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to euromodder For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-26-2019, 12:50 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elmira, NY
Posts: 1,791
Thanks: 320
Thanked 361 Times in 300 Posts
|
A person riding a commuter bicycle might have a Cd of 0.6 and there is hope of fairing it to get a Cd of 0.3 as usable daily rider.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Grant-53 For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-09-2019, 05:57 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2019
Location: California
Posts: 513
2020 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H Last 3: 18.4 mpg (US) 2021 - '08 Chevy Tahoe H 90 day: 17.08 mpg (US) 2022 - '08 chevy Tahoe LT Last 3: 14.38 mpg (US) 2023 - '08 Chevy Tahoe Last 3: 22.61 mpg (US) 2024 - '08 Chevy Tahoe 90 day: 22.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 105 Times in 96 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor95
The author of the article calculated that a brick wall with a Prius engine would still get 29 mpg at 50 mph.
|
the Best i have ever done with a 40 cell Prius battery and 6.0L engine was 28.7 MPG combined 31City/26.4hwy
4x the power of a prius
but only get 25.5MPG on average not too bad for a 6.0l 364Ci engine
not too bad for a 6 foot 6 foot brick wall?
what would you rather drive a v8 6.0l SUV or a 2.7l V6 Chrysler 300? which both get 25mpg?
Last edited by Tahoe_Hybrid; 12-09-2019 at 06:11 PM..
|
|
|
|